System on repeat numbers - new trick

[admin]

Hey Big Slick,

Welcome aboard!
[smiley=4/cheers.gif]

[pascal]

Hi all,
I'm new user, and I'm interested in the system explained in this section, but I really does not understand how to play it.
Why Arte, in the second picture  did you play #10 ?

Thank you .
BR

Pascal

[Jakkalsdraai]

Thanx Arte.  [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

Your posts are very much appreciated. Took me a while to understand your system, but I'm up to speed now. Will now practice it a bit and then give it a go this weekend.

Definately something new to me and I do like it...it's veeeeeeeeeerrryyyy nice!

Cheers Mate!  [smiley=beer.gif]
Jakkalsdraai   [smiley=dankk2.gif]

[Jakkalsdraai]

Hey Arte,

If I may I'll try and explain to Pascal. Unfortunately english is my second language as well, so if I get it wrong I'm sorry.

Ok Pascal the reason Arte plays the number 10 is because you'll see when the 10 was spun he puts 9 numbers as a sector with the 10 in the middle and 4 numbers to the left and four numbers to the right. Now this specific sector hasn't hit or overlap in any of the previous four spins, so 10 is ready to be played. He does the same with the other numbers.

So if a number is spun place the 9 number sector (123454321) with the 5 on the number spun. Remember that the numbers (123454321) is only basically to determine that the number previously spun falls on the 5 and the other numbers are 4 numbers left and four numbers right. These numbers (123454321)haven't any value and efectively could of been (abcdedcba)
So if you write down a sector following the above rules and nothing had hit within this sector in the previous 4 spins you will play this number.

Any additional numbers obtained from going through the same steps above are added. So as you could see in his example he had 3 numbers when he got a hit.

I hope that I have helped you Pascal, and Arte I hope my explanation meets your approval Arte. Again I think that this looks like a very, very nice system. Thanx again and I hope you don't find me to arrogant to try and explain your system.

Kind regards
Cheers [smiley=beer.gif]
Jakkalsdraai

[admin]

Hi all,
I'm new user...
Pascal

Welcome Pascal!!!  [smiley=tekst-toppie.gif]

[Edgardo]

Very...very interesting Arte. In the string 28-15-20-14... the number 14, don´t play?.  Why?

Un saludo cordial, Edgardo.

[MattyMattz]

Hey Arte,

I've finally gotten a good handle on this system and it's very impressive so far.  Question though - have you tried betting on the section (or part of the section) instead of just one number?  I haven't tested much yet, but results are good.  

Thanks for the ideas!
Matt

[pascal]

Thank you jakkal!
and thank you VLS for your welcome!

Unfortunately english is my second language as well, so if I get it wrong I'm sorry.

For me is the same, so please be patient...

Thank you again

Pascal

[Jakkalsdraai]

No problem Pascal.  [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

I hope you understand the system better now. It's true what Arte says, it's very difficult to explain a system even if it seems easy to one self, to actually explain it in words are always difficult.

Anyhow if you have any questions feel free to ask! How does the saying go:"If the baby doesn't cry, the baby doesn't get any milk!" [smiley=grin.gif]

Cheers Mate!  [smiley=beer.gif]

Jakkalsdraai

[MattyMattz]

Hey Arte,

I've been testing this idea lately and am very impressed.  Do you use a progression or flat betting (sorry, I know it's already been asked, but I'm curious)?  I also still don't grasp your 1:52 odds.  Does anyone understand it that could help me out?  I've been testing recently with a mild progression, and my latest result shows +142 after 188 spins.  Highest bet was 3 chips on 3 numbers.

Cheers,
Matt

[JonInRI]

Hey Matty, you said you tested using a mild progression and I was wondering what you were using?

Thanks,
JR

[kacso]

System for "sleeping sector of 9" ?
As easy as
If a sector of 9 "sleeps" for 28 spins the chance to win at the next spins is only 75 %.
Using it as a system ? As Einstein said: "things should be done as simple as possible but not more".
I do not think this "sleeping system" could fulfill the simplicity or long-tun winnings..  

[Lanky]

Hi Guys

Firstly welcome to Family Here At The Forum For all The New Members.

Great to see you here.

@ kacso

I am not sure how you come up with 75% For 9 number section missing 28 times Mate.

But according to John Solitude's Book page 35. (2005 edition )

He States that for  a 9 number section to miss 17 times it would be 99.12% chance of hitting after that.

I am just trying to help thats all.

Your Friend

Lanky

[MattyMattz]

Hey Matty, you said you tested using a mild progression and I was wondering what you were using?

Thanks,
JR

Hey Big Slick,

I was simply using a progression that would always keep me in the positive on a win.  So depending on how many qualified numbers I had, it could be anywhere from 1-4 units per number.  I think the highest it got was 4 numbers, 4 units.

Matt

[MattyMattz]

-