Lohnro's Double Street System

[JHM]

Chicken,

The 81 000 spins were on a single 0 wheel.  So -3,81% is actually worse than house edge.

Insidebet

Every system fails when tested like that. The table can't be beat with math. We're just looking for a event or trigger which allows us to bet. And with human interaction I'm sure you can be winning more than losing.

[insidebet]

JHM,

Thanks for your two bits.

Do you have examples of "triggers" or "human interaction" or "events"?

I have tested a lot "trigger" type systems with the same results.

Can you put some onto this?

Insidebet

[JHM]

JHM,

Thanks for your two bits.

Do you have examples of "triggers" or "human interaction" or "events"?

I have tested a lot "trigger" type systems with the same results.

Can you put some onto this?

Insidebet

How do you mean ''I have tested a lot "trigger" type systems with the same results.''. Did you do live tests? Like I said before, all the automatic testing without human interaction will end up losing. On every system.

Winkel's G.U.T. is a great example which waits for a situation to play. You as the human need to track until you have the target in sight and than pull the trigger / make the bet. Members here are testing with positive results.

[hamsup_sotong]

hi guys,

agree with Jhm's view

Nothing beats live testing, the split decisions, the flow of the session, the possible mistakes made etc. All this will eventually be factored into your "performance".

As for points like changing of tables while you are losing, well to each his own guys. Whatever works for you may not work for someone else. Happy TESTING

CHEERS
Hams
 

[JHM]

hi guys,

agree with Jhm's view

Nothing beats live testing, the split decisions, the flow of the session, the possible mistakes made etc. All this will eventually be factored into your "performance".

As for points like changing of tables while you are losing, well to each his own guys. Whatever works for you may not work for someone else. Happy TESTING

CHEERS
Hams
 

Yes, next to that you gain experience doing live tests. It may sounds strange, but sometimes I join the table and start tracking. Than I see how the table is moving and my instinct says ''don't play''. And off course I play, because I'm testing and I want to know if I'm right. Most of the times when I place my bet I loose.

Example, I'm playing unhit numbers. I join and start tracking, I see a lot doubles coming up, like three in 10 spins. My feeling says ''don't play, most likely another double will come up''. I play and guess, another double.

[hamsup_sotong]

LMAO exactly. It has happened to me before as well. Don't you just wish that u had followed your hunches?

Hams

[JHM]

LMAO exactly. It has happened to me before as well. Don't you just wish that u had followed your hunches?

Hams

While testing, no. Playing with the casino's / fake money  . When I decide to play real money, that I would or should 

[Sedated]

I just read through this post and it looks good.  One thing that i am woundering if you spin 18 times and you have 3 D/S that have only hit twice and you bet on all 3 useing a progression, after 1 hits do you keep betting on the other 2 or do you start over?

[hamsup_sotong]

Hi sedated

You don't bet 3Ds mate... take the last 12 and track another 6 spins

Cheers
Hams

[ChickenDinner]

I know I keep going on about it, but...I do love this system! I played a session earlier where I met the sweetest of hit clouds (as Victor calls them). I know lady luck had her part to play, but nevertheless the system selected the correct double street for me 4 times on the bounce, no progression needed. Don't you just love it when something like that happens!  

[TwoCatSam]

Guys

bj's Magic Lines v0.2 is perfect for this system as he has made it "New Eyes" friendly.  You may eliminate the oldest number in the trot and have a new set of 18 numbers with each spin.

I am aware this is not the way Lohnro said to use it and using it this way may turn a winner into a loser.  But until someone convinces me that Joe, who sits down and begins recording exactly one spin later than Jim, has a lesser chance of winning that Jim, I will continue to believe my "New Eyes on the Marquee" theory.

There is one good thing about it:  If I turn a winner into a loser, then there was winner to ruin.  Logic:  There is a winner!  No one can lose in the long run!  Simply revert to Lonhro's original, which has not been damaged in the fracas, and continue on.


Sam

[JHM]

Guys

bj's Magic Lines v0.2 is perfect for this system as he has made it "New Eyes" friendly.  You may eliminate the oldest number in the trot and have a new set of 18 numbers with each spin.

I am aware this is not the way Lohnro said to use it and using it this way may turn a winner into a loser.  But until someone convinces me that Joe, who sits down and begins recording exactly one spin later than Jim, has a lesser chance of winning that Jim, I will continue to believe my "New Eyes on the Marquee" theory.

There is one good thing about it:  If I turn a winner into a loser, then there was winner to ruin.  Logic:  There is a winner!  No one can lose in the long run!  Simply revert to Lonhro's original, which has not been damaged in the fracas, and continue on.


Sam

System isn't that hard. I thinks it's easy to learn and play.

Lohnro what to do?

1 XXX
2 X
3 XXX
4 XXXXX
5 XXX
6 XXX

[kompressor]

DOES IT MATTER IF ONE DS HAVE NOT BEEN HIT LIKE THIS ??

1 XXXXX
2
3 XX
4 XXXXX
5 XXX
6 XXX

PLAY THE 3 OR RESET WITH THE NEXT 6 ?

[Lohnro]

Lohnro what to do?

1 XXX
2 X
3 XXX
4 XXXXX
5 XXX
6 XXX

No Bet. I would start again and backtrack 12 spins, live track the next 6 and see what the next pattern shows.

[Lohnro]

DOES IT MATTER IF ONE DS HAVE NOT BEEN HIT LIKE THIS ??

1 XXXXX
2
3 XX
4 XXXXX
5 XXX
6 XXX

PLAY THE 3 OR RESET WITH THE NEXT 6 ?

It does not matter to me, I would only play the 3. You never know how long the 2 will sleep for?

[Lohnro]

-