Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

100 % ?

Started by J.Daniels, February 13, 2008, 09:27:24 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

J.Daniels

Hello forum

I wonder, does it exist any method or system to get 1 chip 100%?.

I mean only 1 [smiley=shocked.gif] is it hard?

Cheers

Malty

There wasn't any system like this......There isn't any system like this.....There won't be a system like this......
Nothing in this world is 100%....nothing......

You asked is it really that hard?? My friend.....if there would be something like that the casinos would ban roulette long time ago....

I would advise you to read a bit more of the post in this forum...I think tah tyou can learn alot my friend...

Wish you a nice day,

Malty

admin

QuoteHello forum

I wonder, does it exist any method or system to get 1 chip 100%?.

I mean only 1 [smiley=shocked.gif] is it hard?

Cheers

Hi mate. Even if not 100% , you can work with the averages.

You could go with a very very large bankroll and a D'alembert to try to get +1

You could use a reversed progression on the even chances and leave if you are +1 or more in one favorable "concatenation of hits" (i.e. with reversed marty).

You can try to use Balance/Imbalance and wait for a heavy inbalance and try to catch +1 from the return of the %, then leave.

...there are actually many ways in which you could get +1 "almost always", but it would be a matter on how much you lose when you don't get the +1 ( i.e. session "from hell" losing from the very first spin all the way down and never recoup -it happens).

Instead of looking for a 100% way, my advice is to look at how to win in the averages  [smiley=smiley.gif]

Regards,
Victor

lucky_strike

QuoteI mean only 1 :o is it hard?

J Daniels. is this what you are looking for...

I have been experimenting whit small bankrolls and used a bet selection based upon imbalance and no progression, just for fun...

Here is a short test i run. BR 4 units Profit 31 units.

So if this is what you are looking for i can recommend my next post of CPM  [smiley=wink.gif]





J.Daniels

".there are actually many ways in which you could get +1 "almost always", but it would be a matter on how much you lose when you don't get the +1"

I see, you are completly right. this what I was thinking though. The point to play roulette, at least for me, Its to have a regular income with 99% chances to win,. Its what we all dream about ( maybe not  :P ). But even with a big rate of winning, you should be sure to dont lose it all in case you lose. Thats why you can make +1 profit, but how much are you risking for that.. it doesnt make sens. But if you want to get, for example, 50€/$ a month, why instead of playing a lot wich 1€$ chips and wining 1 by 1, just take a bigger 50€$ chip and get only +1?. The less you bet, the less its the chance to lose.

Well, VLS I was reading your strategic Lw`s game lately. I think this method its the only way at the time. Congratulations for your nice job, really smart. :). I know that you are working on lines, dozens etc.. where the Lw concentration is bigger. I am making some test with the system against the secuence, and the L and w concentration are really together:

nolinkswLnolinksnolinkswLnolinksnolinksnolinksnolinksLnolinksnolinksnolinksnolinksnolinksnolinksnolinkswwL

What do you think? could we do a good use of that?

Thanks for the responses and Cheers

JackDaniels



J.Daniels

Lol luckyS. you answered just when I was posting [smiley=lolk.gif].

Exactly! its what i was looking for, something like that. If you go to casino just 1 per 2 weeks and get +1, +2 or +3 of course we are talking about 1 chip it can either 1 euro or 100... or 1000.., isnt it better than going there every day making the same but smaller?. If u lose at least, you dont lose your time!


Thanks and Cheers!

J.Daniels

Quote
Nothing in this world is 100%....nothing.....

Well, i can tell you 100% that We all are gonna die!! ;)

Have a nice day too [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

lucky_strike


Ops... that was fun did we post at the same time ;D


J.Daniels

So, maybe a progression that could hold a ratio of -10 and +10 surfing above and under 0 forever?

Im not a math guy. I believe in rational and strategic play but.. do you guys think this is possible? could you like that get one unit every time? Maybe Its not possible..

Regards

JackDaniels

kawa4711

@Lucky Strike

Quote
Here is a short test I run. BR 4 units Profit 31 units.  
Quote

Which system brings this excellent result?
Best regards

kawa4711

lucky_strike


Its based upon Cut Point Methodology and i have to add that was just a short test.

I will make a new post for it soon.

Cheers Lucky Strike

kawa4711

@Lucky Strike

[smiley=thumbsup.gif]
QuoteIts based upon Cut Point Methodology and I have to add that was just a short test.

QuoteI will make a new post for it soon.

I m curious about this interesting idea

Best regards
kawa4711

MattyMattz

Quote
Its based upon Cut Point Methodology and i have to add that was just a short test.

I will make a new post for it soon.

Cheers Lucky Strike


Just curious - how is this a "short test" when it entails over 10,000 spins??

Matt

lucky_strike


Hi i just tried an idea whit a statistcal ecart less then 2,5 win 2 in a row and i would not use anything that hasn't been tested for 100 000 or above.

Cheers Lucky Strike

lucky_strike

-