HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[JHM]

Guys,

I'll say this once again for the people who still come with answers that it's all BS. It's not the point if it's true or not.  There's a lot of good information, like you only have series, short and long. The main goal is that the information let us think different and change our look at the game. We make different approaches. 

If you're here because you still think systems work than I would say you're full of BS. Because in the end systems don't work, period. The only things that work what I believe are:

- Bias
- Dealer signature
- Visual Ballistics
- .......... that's what I'm looking for now.

I do know, if you can beat randomness you can beat the game. And that is some information from the site too.

I please want to ask for a last time, if you think we're waisting our time on this, than DON'T post. It has no added value to the topic.

[ChipChip]

I really don't know what the real deal is,
however,
besides Kimo Li....
this 52million euro Charles man sounds sincere and very profound.
Well,
what is the winning bet?

[JHM]

Let's forget about scam or not. If a system for sale comes up we'll notice at that time.

Sewje, thank you for signing up and sharing your knowledge. That's where this topic is for. To find that bet together.

[JHM]

Victor,

You have my blessing. It's a great Idea.

Thank you.

[New Ken]

When we get back to trying to find what the thread says we're looking for, I'll return here...


New Ken

[WARRIOR]

at one time on the first page now its no longer there charles explained he came to finding his bet by  using the word remanufacturing the results  and when he had showed us the bet following the streets  that is what he means by movement   and he used the past results he would follow what ever street came  and bet on it but he says that is not the bet they use . so for us we need to look at that example work from there buy using this stratagie he came up with the bet he s been using for thirteen years.

[RoulettePlayer]

Just to follow up on what CHARLES wrote regarding -quote- "remanufacturing the results", I researched the archives of the web site and came up with this, which is what I believe he is referring to:

"I will not bother to list the "why nots" for the other games, because I can only concern myself with the game that pays me. Roulette of course. To find a roulette bet that is a consistent winner I could only suggest you do not go down the conventional route. I do not think it is important you know the very essence of the wheel or numbers makeup. I am going to give you a clue. I found my bet by re-manufacturing the results. It is straight betting, but a "double-edged" bet that takes advantage of the randomness of the wheel. In doing so I had by-passed the different layouts between the European and American wheel. It works on both!

But! You must take into account, that although my bet is a simple bet, there is still the difference in the overall odds to make a slight difference to your yearly income by using an American wheel. Yes, I have used them, but only for pure convenience. So many lose so much on them it hurts me to see it. Double zero wheels are a rip-off, and bad odds for any gambler. The good news is that more and more casinos are using the European wheel and rules. The average gambler is getting more "odds savvy" by the day. Casinos have no option but to change."

Hope this helps, though I have my doubts.  RP

[madupz4]

AND LSO I WOULD STILL BE WILLING TO TRY AND FIGUER THAT PUZZLE OUT

Did he ever mention if he used a progression or if he was flat betting?

[JLP]

Hi RP,

"I found my bet by re-manufacturing the results. It is straight betting, but a "double-edged" bet that takes advantage of the randomness of the wheel".

From this I guess is an inside bet on straight numbers that uses a second layer in the bet, maybe combining the same numbers with same splits.

Cheers,
JLP.-

[JHM]

It keeps me thinking, but I still can't get to it [smiley=1/ne_nau.gif]

[Carlitos]

If it is an inside bett how are you gonna cover this with only 4 betts?? I thought of following the numbers in their own street and see whether they match up with the others in their own street and then place an bett on 2 dozens and 2 colomns.



So lett' say that these numbers came up -,


25 is the first in its street.
6 is the sixed in its street.
36 is the sixed in its street.
1 is the first in its street.
8 is the second in its street.
15 is the third in its street.



Then you would bett the 1 and 3 dozen and the 1 and 3 colomn. This way one could say that there is something like an trap bett.






Carlitos 

[madupz4]

Hi RP,

"I found my bet by re-manufacturing the results. It is straight betting, but a "double-edged" bet that takes advantage of the randomness of the wheel".

From this I guess is an inside bet on straight numbers that uses a second layer in the bet, maybe combining the same numbers with same splits.

Cheers,
JLP.-

When he  says "straight betting," does that mean "FLAT betting" with NO progression?

[Ka2]

If you would have read his website...you would know the answer!

[madupz4]

If you would have read his website...you would know the answer!

I did read the webiste.  It's vauge.

[JLP]

Hi,

Also I have posted something about this on Spanish Forum, but in relation to the other site.

nolinks://nolinks.foros-ruleta.com/1-vt9672.html?postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

Floodish, the other poster have been experimenting with this type of bet :

He says in relation to the anomalies found on columns that we must have to find a productive bet -

-3 chips on column 3
-2 chips on Red
-1 chip on each split : 8/11 10/13 17/20 26/29 28/31
-1 chip on zero or 1/2 chip

Total : 11 chips

So then he covers here the 3rd dozen where are the most reds - 8 reds, also covers red and with the splits he covers the blacks that form a zigzag pattern in the bet on the table layout in the 1st and 2nd columns.

Cheers,
JLP.-

[JLP]

-