HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[New Ken]

Good stuff, JHM...

a key word: consistency... so let's see...

[ernesto]

Maybe that's only the Hampshire 5 bet! 

Charles said:

STOP LOOKING AT THE MATHS. IT TRULY IS THAT SIMPLE !

But I'm affraid that is too simple.

ernesto

[New Ken]

I'm only afraid, if it doesn't work...

In the meantime...

[HansHuckebein]

well, but i think, we've found one more part of the puzzle, which isn't too bad. 

[New Ken]

Nice spirit, Hans.
My real fear is what if we find the whole damn thing, and spill it out for the whole damn casino world to see!!

JHM, you with me...?

[JHM]

Ken,

I'm definitely with you mate.

I'm tired right now. But I will do some more testing.

[ernesto]

Quick test with 37 old Dublinbet spins:
Loss -31 unit

But what we can do with the few numbers which have same characteristics?
I think this is an important part too.

ernesto

[ernesto]

Ken!

If you found, you don't go to the casino and make thousands of dollars!
You should sell it on ebay for 500 $ 

ernesto

[New Ken]

Ernesto, what's that I detect, sarcasm...?


...or more...?

[New Ken]

AHH...it's an awesome pursuit, this thread is.

Would it be fair to those that made sincere effort to find this bet (assuming it exists, of course) to share it with those who mocked and ridiculed all the way, if indeed it is found...?

Just wondering.

NEW KEN

[redhot]

Nice work there Ken but I must stress that Charles has said we need to trap the runs AND the changes. It cannot be simply follow the last.

[WARRIOR]

marven thanks for the response and your thouhts what you say makes alot of sense ,as far as charles being a stratagie player. but why would he be so fixed on this bet , and not following patterns,  if he uses a lw situation hes looking for a trigger to happen isnt that the same as looking at a pattern to happen, so what your saying is find a bet that you like and stratagie . his bet loses 6 in a row on occasion he said, could it be that he looks for a trend to end lets say 1 dozen comes in 4 times bets the other two  he did say there are 4 winning bets in the game maybe he figured out some bets that dont reapeat  to high  like even chances can reapeat 30 times  any ways those are my thoughts gizmtron once said that we should look for endings of trends i dont no if that makes sense  . cheers.

[Marven]

Hi Tino,

thanks marven for your reply but isnt the lw stratagie in a sense  following patterns  .

It could be seen as spotting and following patterns. Spotting and following inconsistencies in the outcomes of the bet selection and taking advantage of them, of the 'swings', at a better than the odds rate.

Results come in the form of waves, back and forth, and as a strategy player you ought to jump in at certain situations and take advantage of the flow of randomness and step back when you're in the plus, because you know that you won't remain so if you keep yourself 'within' the flow, and randomness will sooner or later balance itself and take the money back if you do.

The essence of strategy play lies in not trying to take advantage of ALL randomness with all its waves (as opposed to what continuous systematic bettors do) only bits of it, certain situations which our humble human understanding tells us are to be taken advantage of. It could be patterns, winning streaks, losing streaks, etc.

Such 'predictions' do not always turn out to be correct of course, since even if we take those bits of randomness in which we jump in to bet, and put them together (forming our lifetime personal betting actuals) they still for randomness in themselves, and therein lies the challenge.

That is one of the things I liked about this game. It is the man challenging the uncomprehensible.

It might be a way of 'creating our own luck', but the aim is always to come out in the profit regardless of the negative edge embedded in the game.

What Charles means by beating the game not the odds is that you should imagine a perfectly fair game with no edge to neither the house nor the player, then find a way to win consistently and effectively from such zero-edge game.
Once you find such way, the actual odds would have been taken care of. I believe that this makes sense and that this statement does have merit.

but why would he be so fixed on this bet , and not following patterns

I did notice that he says he relies on a mechanical bet that wins not every bet, but every session played.

To be honest I am skeptical about the existence of such easy/mechanical yet so effective and safe bet. I do not know of a way that guarantees winning every session as Charles claims, nor am I sure that such a thing exists or not.
I do however keep an open and researchful mind.

Cheers,
Marven

[HansHuckebein]

i did some manual testing, which turned out with a slight plus. but as i test manually, it takes an awful lot of time. maybe someone could write a code and test it with roulette extreme?

[JHM]

marven thanks for the response and your thouhts what you say makes alot of sense ,as far as charles being a stratagie player. but why would he be so fixed on this bet , and not following patterns,  if he uses a lw situation hes looking for a trigger to happen isnt that the same as looking at a pattern to happen, so what your saying is find a bet that you like and stratagie . his bet loses 6 in a row on occasion he said, could it be that he looks for a trend to end lets say 1 dozen comes in 4 times bets the other two  he did say there are 4 winning bets in the game maybe he figured out some bets that dont reapeat  to high  like even chances can reapeat 30 times  any ways those are my thoughts gizmtron once said that we should look for endings of trends i dont no if that makes sense  . cheers.

Tino,

When Charles is walking through a casino. He had access to multiple tables. He can just walk around and watch which table is suitable for his bet. In that way he can play consistently.

As for ending trends. When a trend had ended you never know what comes up next.

[JHM]

-