HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[JHM]

I have to test the bet further. If it really is the bet I'll sent you a message  .

[Ka2]

I would really appreciate that. 

[ryan08]

just remember though if you do have your bet, based on the fact you place a bet 3 out of 4 spins, it will need to last around 12-13000 spins

[Carlitos]

............. what i also found intresting is the fact that he mentions that are about 200 pro roulette players in the world 



How does he know this?? 




Carlitos

[Marven]

Sounds very interesting JHM. Keep testing mate, I would also appreciate if you keep me posted regarding this. [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

I believe lots of ideas are going to arise from this thread. Let's keep it alive.

I never stopped thinking since I read that site.
I am especially interested in the 'to beat roulette we must beat randomness' part.

The only logic to try and beat randomness that I have personally found is to play against 'order', because we know for sure that there will be no such 'order' in the long run, and even if it manifests somewhere, we know for sure it won't last: randomness wins in the end.
This is the only fact we have with regards to future results in roulette.

Patterns do manifest once in a while but ALWAYS break, only randomness lasts. --> We should find a way to use this fact to our benefit.

Will keep researching.

All the best,
Marven

[JHM]

All my tests are from Wiesbaden. With the Wiesbaden spins I had a session of 100 spins which broke even in the end. The other three sessions of 100 spins went very well. So I can't say much if this really is going to work.

I also did some live testing on Dublinbet. And the outcome was disappointing. That were only 45 spins. That's the reason why I don't post the bet. I have to be sure it is a winner. And I don't want to sent anybody in a wrong direction.

[Ka2]

There is really no point of not telling? Because mabye your bet will put some of us in the "right direction" 2 Allways Know More Than one...

Also

Because roulette is random you must remember it is also confined

Doing what everyone else is NOT doing can make you very wealthy 

[JHM]

Marven,

Taking advantage of the randomness is the only way you can beat roulette.

Also see this post, nolinks://vlsroulette.com/general-board/how-to-find-a-consistent-winning-roulette-bet/msg29901/#msg29901

I think you must adjust your bet to what the table is doing (the serie). That's what the bet I'm working on does.

[New Ken]

JHM, I have also been prompted to do research based on Charles Hampshire's hints. So far I have come up with two systems or bets that may have potential.
But I yet to be satisfied.  


The really good thing, a big difference, this time if I come up short I have consolation that THERE IS A WAY, simply because I believe Charles' claims.


In other words, my efforts are not in vain if I don't succeed yet, once I follow his hints.

And this is a tremendous relief to me...


New Ken!

[ryan08]

the answer liess in taking advantage in those patches of order, by that i mean patterns, its patterns guys trust me

[JHM]

Ryan,

Patterns don't exist. Charles also says it. There are only series, short and long. If you still don't agree with me please see

nolinks://vlsroulette.com/general-board/the-brain-seeks-patterns-where-none-exist/
or
nolinks://nolinks.sciam.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=brain-seeks-patterns-where-none-exi-08-10-03

And if you than still think there are patterns, you should stick to it. We do all have different way of thinking and playing.

[Carlitos]

.......... I found this on this website nolinks://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-e9euDY8waaVp.VJAlB8mURJy?p=177



Intresting -,



1. Randomness is a property of the process, not the outcome of the process. Never ever make assumptions of randomness based on purely the outcomes of the process (cryptographers would tell you the extreme dangers of that).



2. Randomness is about unpredictability! It is not about a high variance in outcomes. It is about not being able to predict the outcome. Basically, even if you get a million '2's in a row, if you are unable to predict the million-and-first number, it is a random sequence. On the other hand, if you find a sequence of four statistically random numbers, and can predict the 5th number, it is NOT a random sequence.





Carlitos

[Carlitos]

JHM, how would you define those series, long and short??







Carlitos 

[JHM]

Thanks for sharing carlitos. Guys this doesn't come from the win3million site. To avoid confusion.

Carlitos, I don't know. If I would know that, than I would be a step closer to the bet. I do think it's essential to know.

[ryan08]

they do! they do!, 3 reds in a row is a pattern, red, black, red, is another pattern, the lw are patterns and there is a winning system in there, i have it. i dont get why you disagree with me, what would i get from leading you down the wrong path

[ryan08]

-