HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[madupz4]

Madupz4. I see you also write on Gamblers Glen about the subject. Are you still using your 16+  -20 system?

No it proved to not be consistent.

[WARRIOR]

 jhm -moccomon where are you i think i found something   that might interest you .

[JHM]

jhm -moccomon where are you i think i found something   that might interest you .

Tino I'm right here, you can also sent me a PM

[JHM]

JHM

The thinking was - if the first and second columns appear in order in the last 2 spins, does the third column then appear more often/less often of about 1/3 of the time (as it should).

I have coded columns using A,B and C, so you can easily see "movements across the table". I have noticed that column 3(C) does seem to appear as it should on about 1/3 occasions. However going the other way, C then B but A doesn't appear, maybe, as often as it should. I was thinking bet opposite colour then columns A and B - capturing the run (second column) and the change (colour and first column).

Charles, I thought we should only looking at blocks of exactly 100 spins. Using longer streams of numbers will only make things even more confusing than they are!! 

Mocco

I see, are you going to test this bet Mocco?

[WARRIOR]

 idid 200 spins doubled my bank on each session, ok first you need to look at  the colums  i only have the first part  of the bet ,came across it testing another  ,moccomon mentioned three units but i dont no where to put the third unit yet still working on that part , charles says he notice something that should happen more often ,well if you look at when a dozen and a colum hit i found that they do not hit at the same location that often  what i mean is if the dozen 1 hit colum 1 does not hit so what i did was if 1st dozen hits thats my trigger to bet 2nd colum and third colum ,if the 2nd dozen hits bet 1st colum 3rd colum  3rd dozen hits bet 1st colum 2nd colum.i found itlost 3 times in row with a 0 in there  at 60 spins it went down to a break even point then it went back up , the third unit im not sure where to put that yet to make it a bet with in a bet .give it a try . all the best let me no.

[JHM]

Tino,

That's one amazing bet mate. I only tested 33 spins, lowest was 1 and highest 8. Ended in 7.

Maybe somebody can test this in RX.

[Marven]

Just tested it for about 30 spins and I ended with -1.

By the way, what happened to betting inside the table mates?

Cheers,
Marven

[ernesto]

I don't understand again something, because my poor english.

I discovered something about roulette that should happen more often...a lot more often, but did not!

So something really happen more often? And what about "but did not" at the end of the sentence?
Did not happen more often? Or I'm mistaken?

Can somebody explain me just in one row?

Sorry guys for this english lesson 

ernesto

[WARRIOR]

marven you can bet this inside.

[JHM]

100 spins from Wiesbaden

+1
+1
+1
-2
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
-2
+1
-2
-2
+1
-2
+1
+1
-2
+1
+1
-2
+1
+1
+1
+1
-2
-2
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
-2
+1
-2
+1
-2
-2
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
-2
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
-2
-2
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
-2
+1
+1
+1
-2 (0)
-2
-2 (0)
-2
+1
-2
-2
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
-2 (0)
-2
+1
-2
+1
-2
+1
-2
+1
-2
+1
-2
+1
+1
-2
+1
+1
+1

End +10

[JHM]

Marven,

If you had jumped in the middle of my session you could have end in a -1. What happens if you continue testing that 30 spins into 100 spins?

[Marven]

Nice quick testing JHM mate.

The bet's performance seems to me similar to LD (last dozens).

I think it will break even eventually. Perhaps this is his 'dummy bet', something that doesn't win, but doesn't loose aggressively, and keeps going up and doing around the zero point. Perhaps some other bet inside it is needed.

(Note: of course I'm intentionally ignoring the house edge, as Charles asked us to forget about the "maths" for a second when making the bet)

Cheers,
Marven

[Carlitos]

........... still pretty much coventional......









Carlitos 

[JHM]

Marven,

I do like the Idea behind it, when a dozen hits we play the opposing columns. That's unconventional.

Carlitos,

You think that's conventional? Now I start doubting what's conventional and unconventional.

[Breeze88]

Hi guys

try to put the 3 unit on High and Low..


example 8 showed 1 unit on Column B , 1 unit on Column C and 1 unit on 1-18 

bet opposite column from dozen that showed and bet same area High/Low showed


cheerz

[Breeze88]

-