HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[JHM]

Ken,

I have found several bets on double streets. You mean my bet on 3, 4 or 5 double streets?

[JHM]

Mocco,

Please see my post on the previous page. I do not think we are looking for a specific bet that wins after 100 spins.

[Marven]

Hi JHM,

Good thinking mate.

However I think you got this one quote wrong:

Guys, I came across this on Charles site

ours, an engineered bet with condensed instructions for ease of play.

The bet is easy, so what's easy and unconventional?

The instructions of his 'bet' need to be condensed down in order to be easily playable.

Something that needs to be condensed in order to be understood is obviously not so simple, or why would we need condensing the instructions for ease of play.

His bet in it's raw/un-condensed form is probably not easy to play.

Besides, logically, "Not simple and unconventional" makes more sense than "simple and unconventional".

Regards,
Marven

[New Ken]

JHM, Iwas talking about this stuff concerning streets:


1   R+O   
2 B+E
3 R+O
4 B+E
5 B+O
6 R+E
7 R+O
8 B+E
9 R+O
10 B+E
11 B+O
12 R+E

[New Ken]

didn't he say ---to throw the casino managers off track---you can even puposely LOSE a few bets?!

THAT, to my mind, sounds like a bet that is pretty sound.

(just thought I'd re-mention it in case anybody missed it... )


NEW KEN

[JHM]

Marven,

You're right mate. But I can rember he also stated somwhere on his site that he found the bet by default. And that the bet is easy. When I come across the quote on his site I will add. I'm a little confused here.

I hope you like the rest of the information in my post. I do think we can exclude single numbers and Chevals. We're up a new step.

[JHM]

I see Ken, and how do you see the streets applied in play?

[Moccoman]

Sorry Madupz4, I must have interpreted your comment at reply 777 incorrectly:

"Everyone knows there are exactly 6 double streets on the table, correct?"

JHM, who knows why "exactly 100 spins" was picked - maybe it can tank after that or maybe 100 spins is the longest you should need to generate the required profit and get the heck outta there!!

[JHM]

Guys,

For who haven't seen this. Herb posted a while ago nolinks://math.ucsd.edu/~anistat/gamblers_ruin.html.

Pretty consistent. There always comes a point where you're up before you lose all.

[New Ken]

Haven't given it the necessary thought yet, JHM---but I will.


I'm trying to stay with the signposts:

One of them is: you can afford to lose a few bets,--- so it's pretty powerful.

Charles also says: "There is nothing complicated about the bets you can find..."

AND I think it has something to do with the last number spun, or winners....

he says:

AND NOW AS A REWARD FOR READING THIS FAR:

OUR BET IS "A SIMPLE "TRAP" BET.
A BET THAT TRAPS ENOUGH WINNERS TO GIVE EACH SESSION A VERY GOOD PROFIT.  WE LOVE RANDOMNESS!
STOP LOOKING AT THE MATHS.
IT TRULY IS THAT SIMPLE !



....TRAPS ENOUGH WINNERS...


He's altered this line a bit, but originally he called this "a great clue", and mentioned "winners" twice.

[JHM]

Ken,

Do you think you can win consistent with an EC bet? I think he is playing 24 nr's.

[New Ken]

actually, JHM, i think that's along the lines of what he was researching, believing winners should occur very often---before he discovered something else!


NEW KEN

[Marven]

So he discovered that winners should happen more often but they didn't, so he played the opposite and, as a result, trapped more winners than losers.

Moccoman,

JHM, who knows why "exactly 100 spins" was picked - maybe it can tank after that or maybe 100 spins is the longest you should need to generate the required profit and get the heck outta there!!

His playing 100spins-limit sessions should go well with his playing 2 hours max per session.

[Marven]

ok not bad so far...

This thread has become like a chat room!
It's currently the most active in the forum.

Cheers,
Marven

[WARRIOR]

moccomon  what would you suggest to get a 12 8 and 4 loss

[WARRIOR]

-