Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

Started by JHM, November 28, 2008, 01:47:41 PM

0 Members and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

madupz4

The only thing I can think of that is a bet of 12 units and gives you an 8 unit win and 4 unit loss is:

Ex:
-4 units on column 1
-4 units on column 2
-4 units on red.

-Any red in column 1 or 2 equals +8
-Any red in column 3 equals -4
-Any black in column 1 or 2 is zero (brakes even)

*BUT any of the 4 blacks in column 3 or the zero equals -12.

WARRIOR


Moccoman

Tino,

Originally, I thought the bet would be:

4 units on red
4 units on columns 1 and 3 or

4 units on black
4 units on columns 1 and 2

each of these gives (for the 37 numbers) 14 wins, 13 losses and 10 break evens
The wins being 8 on 14 numbers and the losses being 12 on 9 numbers and 4 on 4 numbers

Only now I have thought, seeing as Charles really pushes the black + even and red + odd differentials (and no others on the site 20/10/07), that maybe the bet is:

4 units on black and even and second column or
4 units on red and odd and third column

each of these gives 16 wins, 19 losses and 2 break evens
The wins being 16 on 4 numbers, 8 on 6 numbers and 4 on 6 numbers
The losses being 12 on 9 numbers and 4 on 10 numbers

If any of these is the right one, then it's a matter of working out the trigger.

Then again if Madupz4 is the Consistent Bet then .....

Spinman

WOW Guys are flying here,
been a bit busy and you guys have gone bananas!
This is a bit like the da Vinci code..lol

reading through Charles' site again, a few things struck me:

1. The bet is automatic
2. You trap the runs, and the changes quickly enough (not all) at better than odds rate
3. It is not a predictive bet

This leads me to think the last spun no guides you????

Also there are 2 lines with more blacks in them and 1 with more reds in it...the 5 lines in between the conventional lines

Just my 2 cents worth

Rgds



Ka2

Does anybody allready noticed if one would play these 2 line bets: (10/11/12/13/14/15) and (28/29/30/31/32/33) its also a dozen bet, but not very equal. You got 8 blacks and 4 reds, but 6 of those blacks are odd and all red are even.

And also if one would play these 4 street bets: (1/2/3) and (7/8/9) and (19/20/21) and (25/26/27) You've also got a dozen bet, but also not very equal. You got 8 reds and 4 blacks, but this time all 8 of the red are odd! and all black are even.

Combine these 2 "dozen" bets, with the 2 regular ones (2nd and 3th column) and we've got 4 bets in total.

But how to play them, that's the question......I could not find it.

ikarianman


Ka2

Quote from: ikarianman on January 29, 2009, 10:32:59 AM
hello everyone i found this,looks it exists
nolinks://nolinks.acetf.org/

uuuuhmmm...if you would have read his website, there is also a link to acetf....

ikarianman


New Ken


JHM asked:

"Ken,

Do you think you can win consistent with an EC bet? I think he is playing 24 nr's."



I answered :

"...actually, JHM, i think that's along the lines of what he was researching, believing winners should occur very often---before he discovered something else!"


Marven goes:

"So he discovered that winners should happen more often but they didn't, so he played the opposite and, as a result, trapped more winners than losers."


Not bad, Marv---AND THIS TELLS ME WHY THERE ARE MORE LOSERS THAN WINNERS.



Cheers

NEW KEN

ChipChip

Charles(THE MAN)said:
There are roughly 200 pro in the world now,
each make 3million E  every year!

So, every year, casinos lost 600 millions E.

He also said:
TENACITY WILL WIN IN THE END

Therefore,this forum will find the winning bet sooner or later,
that will add another 2000 roulette-pro ( God knows how many people
reading this forum,and how many friends and relatives they have!)
Let say roughly 3000 pros in this planet.
each pockets 3 million E  every year!

That will be 9 billions E lost to the casinos!
I don't know the casino-staff will roller and play dead
or Roulette will become dinasour.
That's all,folks!



Carlitos


Ka2

Quote from: ChipChip on January 29, 2009, 01:35:50 PM
Charles(THE MAN)said:
There are roughly 200 pro in the world now,
each make 3million E  every year!

So, every year, casinos lost 600 millions E.

He also said:
TENACITY WILL WIN IN THE END

Therefore,this forum will find the winning bet sooner or later,
that will add another 2000 roulette-pro ( God knows how many people
reading this forum,and how many friends and relatives they have!)
Let say roughly 3000 pros in this planet.
each pockets 3 million E  every year!

That will be 9 billions E lost to the casinos!
I don't know the casino-staff will roller and play dead
or Roulette will become dinasour.
That's all,folks!




I also think we maybe put to much info on this thread?

ernesto

Yes, there are much useful info and good ideas.
But the biggest problem is we don't know when we found something good piece of the puzzle.

We discuss many new idea and almost every test finish with loss. But maybe just a little part was wrong, but we can't go forward because we don't know which part was good, which was wrong.

Maybe the good direction is on this thread first page, but only one piece missing, so everybody feel that is bad way.

There are many possibilities. Too much is the unknow parameter at this time.

But the hard work will be rewarding soon or later.

ernesto

pighead

Ernesto,
We need to organize the workflow, from filtering the ideas to testing the selection..bouncing ideas is not enough.

that's why Marven and I build the team to do that.. We need to find the bet in a more " professional" way!!




New Ken

Which leads me to think, Pighead and Ernesto, that ol' Charles Hampshire himself (assuming he's aware of this thread) must know his bet will be figured out with so many serious attacks at the puzzle from so many intelligent people (assuming we are ::)  ).

Maybe that's why he added (recently? ) "don't blame him if we didn't read his pages properly". I mean don't be surprised if he pulls down the site for a while, until we wander off in another roulette direction...


Hmm...?


NEW KEN

New Ken

-