HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[pighead]

I have gone through his website and I found something funny,he copied so much on the page 14.

nolinks://nolinks.secretsofself-mademillionaires.com/index-aff2.html

[WARRIOR]

i checked it out and your wright page 14 is copyed from this sight  this could be all bull shit. good work on finding this  .

[pighead]

Even though that webpage seems fishy but I still found something inspiring such as

" A guaranteed Loser is a guaranteed Winner?" ,

that reminds me the chameleon strategy and also think about the bet selection..

it seems like we tend to make the wrong decision all the time..

why? because of the randomness nature of the game or something else..

[pighead]

I think I get the idea from the sentences below on page 15th..


Taking advantage of the randomness is the only way you can beat roulette. Look at the game...not the maths.

[WARRIOR]

now how would you take advantage of a random game   . what does random mean  not knowing  whats next. unless your psychic,he says on page 5 to look at the results and it will give you movement of results across the table  what does that mean  i  interpret that as follow the last concept which all of us allready no that, just by doing that aren t you following a pattern . next you need a bet that takes advantage of the runs and changes  what does that mean i interepret that as  a pattern a series of results isnt that the same, then hes says your bet should win by flat betting thats on the inside of the table ,thats what he told me when i asked him the question where am i level betting .the bets bets you make inside are the same as the outside side betting unless your playing sectors, we all no that. find a bet thats garenteed to lose, and you found a winning bet  .ok i will bet1 number at a time as it comes out .thats a loser bet . it does not make any sense  .

[WARRIOR]

of the subjecte of charles what do you guys think of sequetial  roulette book  it cost 100 dollars in pounds is this book interesting does any ony herd about it

[pighead]

now how would you take advantage of a random game. what does random mean  not knowing  whats next. unless your psychic,he says on page 5 to look at the results and it will give you movement of results across the table  what does that mean  I  interpret that as follow the last concept which all of us allready no that, just by doing that aren t you following a pattern . next you need a bet that takes advantage of the runs and changes  what does that mean I interepret that as  a pattern a series of results isnt that the same, then hes says your bet should win by flat betting thats on the inside of the table ,thats what he told me when I asked him the question where am I level betting .the bets bets you make inside are the same as the outside side betting unless your playing sectors, we all no that. find a bet thats garenteed to lose, and you found a winning bet  .ok I will bet1 number at a time as it comes out .thats a loser bet . it does not make any sense  .

Charles, He said " look at the game, not the odds". I think we should look at the game from outside of the game.

[WARRIOR]

what do you mean from ouside of the game.

[pighead]

what do you mean from ouside of the game.

Charles, image youself at casino, drinking a beer at the bar and watching whole bunch of ppl at roulette table.
forget about how to catch pattern, LW  and randomness, what you need to do is to find a consistent loser and place bet against him.
he bets black, you bet red, he does 1st dz, you do 2nd and 3rd dz..

In my opinion,  if what MR.Charles said was true, I bet he is using some other techniques outside of the games. A game that makes use of  his randomness rules yet casino to follow..

[Ka2]

I also thought of this myself, betting against players. But I think on page 16 he says something about testing "his" system with wiesbaden spins. So that wouldn't work...  He also makes a remark about the dashed line in the wiesbaden spins, what represents the dealer change... maybe we have to take advantage of that somehow?

[Marven]

What if he's a Bias/Dealer Signature player?

Seriously though, the only thing that kept me from thinking that he is a VB player in disguise is the fact that he said we should look at the table never the wheel.

The strange thing is that we all know, and so does he, that the table is symmetrical and unbeatable.
He also seems to be clearly talking about a bet selection, and we all know that bet selection ALONE doesn't make us win on the long run.
I did consider that his 'Bet[smiley=engel017.gif]' could be a certain strategy or MM thing (especially since he talks about beating the game not the odds), but then it seems to be clear that it isn't the case and that he's talking about a BET in the common sense of the word (a bet selection).

So what the heck?

...The mystery continues...

[JHM]

I have gone through his website and I found something funny,he copied so much on the page 14.

nolinks://nolinks.secretsofself-mademillionaires.com/index-aff2.html

It seems Charles got his information from that site, as it exhist longer.

Registered through: CheapCheapDomainNames.com
Domain Name: SECRETSOFSELF-MADEMILLIONAIRES.COM
Created on: 18-May-06
Expires on: 18-May-09
Last Updated on:

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (nolinks://nolinks.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: WIN3MILLION.COM
Created on: 30-Jun-07
Expires on: 30-Jun-10
Last Updated on: 03-Jun-08

[Ka2]

The strange thing is that we all know, and so does he, that the table is symmetrical and unbeatable.

The table is not symmetrical, definitely not...

[Marven]

It seems Charles got his information from that site, as it exhist longer.

Naughty Charles!

[Marven]

The table is not symmetrical, definitely not...

Symmetrical: –adjective
Characterized by or exhibiting symmetry; well-proportioned, as a body or whole; regular in form or arrangement of corresponding parts.
source: nolinks://dictionary.reference.com/browse/symmetrical

Hi Ka2,

I was talking in terms of embedded payout.
The table is made and arranged in such a way that it leaves absolutely no chance to place a single bet that overcomes the house edge when played consistently or in combination with any other bets.

This is what made Einstein say that the only way to win left is to steal chips from the table, and he was right in THAT sense. There is no mathematical 'flaw' in the roulette table.

But Einstein was not a professional gambler.
So is roulette still beatable?
I'd say: Hell yes.

Regards,
Marven

[Marven]

-