HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[Ka2]

I think its better to focus on one clue at a time, otherwise its gonna get to chaotic. Also I agree with newken we have to be careful who is reading this forum as well. Maybe we can get a password protected thread? That's why I didnt write down some things I've find out.

Also 2 more things...

I'm absolutly convinced the "bet" consist out of multiple spins (37-19) (37-13) (You must understand one important fact before you proceed. You will never find a roulette bet that will win every bet you place. You can find a bet that will win more bets or money than losing ones. So for example if you win 3 bets out of every 5 you place at even odds you are winning at a rate of one in five or two in ten. Therefore to win twenty x your bet you would need to plan a session of one hundred bets. Different odds mean a different calculation.)

Also he bets every spin. So no point in registering LW's or something. (our bet is "automatic". We know where to bet each and every spin)

So I say we all concentrate at one clue at a time. I'm still trying to define the "game"

[Ka2]

Defining the game:

Because roulette is random it means that anything can happen and at anytime within the parameters of the game

So when Charles is talking about the "game" I think he's is referring to these parameters

"parameters"? yes, easy. number 1 will always be RED / ODD / LOW / DOZEN I / COLUMN I / FIRST STREET / FIRST LINE BET etc. 1 will never be BLACK / EVEN / HIGH / etc...

[ernesto]

Also he bets every spin. So no point in registering LW's or something.

I totally agree with you, because if you wait 5 red in a row the next spin can be red again, so why wait some specific trigger?
But if he bet every spin he have to bet everytime the same bet (or combinations of bets) because every number has same chance to win at every spin. He play his bet (or four bet) for years constantly? Nobody ask him why play (for example) red+odd+1.dozen+2.column at every spin...

My simple stupid example:
If the the table has 19 even and 17 odd number (but only Charles can recognise this) he play all the time the even bet because he can cover or trap more winner than looser. And he win small, but win.

Maybe I'm on wrong way if he calculate his next bet from the past results.

ernesto

[Ka2]

Dont look for patterns, look at the "game" I'm currently looking for "what if's" in the game, still i dont know excactly what the game is, But i think I'm getting close, at least I found out some stuff that I never looked at before. And indeed you need the randomness, if there was no randomness, you would lose!

[WARRIOR]

he does bet every spin until hes in profit

[Marven]

One page 7, he wrote:

Waiting Periods is the very small price you pay under the hidden factor system. The house will have its win streaks. On other occasions the player will be barley holding his own. This results in dull waiting periods. Being bored is not fun, but it is a lot better than being a loser.

In the questions and answers, he also wrote:

Q. I found a winning bet, but it is too boring. What do I do ?

A. Sounds like you are a "Gambler" and not a "Profit" person. I cannot help you. I have no interest in gambling or gamblers.

It seemed to me that he is not betting on every spin, but oh well.

Cheers,
Marven

[Ka2]

READ. Page 7 is not his BET, but an alternative...

[WARRIOR]

marven when he  posted that bet on the streets he was betting every spin i saw that , but his staments are confusing .

[redhot]

Yes page 7 is an alternative, it is just a money management strategy NOT the "consistent winning bet".

[Marven]

That is why on other pages of my website you may see things that slightly contradict what you have just read. Do not let the difference confuse you.

You are right, guys, my mistake.

Regards,
Marven

[WARRIOR]

im trying this bet i bet every spin on even  money h l follow the last low comes in i bet if it switches to h lets third dozen  i follow it if its a middle dozen i switch to h or l  flat bet only im trying fo 12 units.

[redhot]

Just watched a few spins at dublin and took the results to try and see the 'Movement' Charles talks about:
[table=,]
Result,Colour,Odd/Even,High/low,Dozen,Column
11,B,O,L,1,2
10,B,E,L,1,1
22,B,E,H,2,1
34,R,E,H,3,1
18,R,E,L,2,3
34,R,E,H,3,1
14,R,E,L,2,2
7,R,O,L,1,1
34,R,E,H,3,1
35,B,O,H,3,2
14,R,E,L,2,2
28,B,E,H,3,1
24,B,E,H,2,3
5,R,O,L,1,2
12,R,E,L,1,3
24,B,E,H,2,3
2,B,E,L,1,2
10,B,E,L,1,1
10,B,E,L,1,1
3,R,O,L,1,3
[/table]

Now just from that quick session it would seem that atleast one section always goes on a run on the next spin e.g black follows black or odd follows odd.

Only one spin, when number 5 came after 24, did all five of the sections change.

Charles talks about, "I discovered something about roulette that should happen more often...a lot more often, but did not!" Maybe it is something like this?

What do you think, can you see the 'Movements' in the results above?

[JHM]

Redhot,

Ended +5. Not bad. The result seems to go up and down.

[redhot]

Redhot,

Ended +5. Not bad. The result seems to go up and down.

What, playing follow the last?

[moch]

i did some manual testing, which turned out with a slight plus. but as i test manually, it takes an awful lot of time. maybe someone could write a code and test it with roulette extreme?

Hi Hans,

I will do it. Explain the system, please

[moch]

-