HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[Ka2]

Following the last outcome isn't it, so if the last outcome is 3, (red, odd, low, d1, c3) you will lose. I allready tested this with wiesbaden spins, and it doesnt work. Besides (with all due respect) but i'm getting a bit tired, of people trying all kind of system's, but not take in account all the clues, (4 bets in total anyone). That's why I say lets FOCUS on one thing at a time.....

[Marven]

Hi Ka2 mate,

Can you please show me where he says that he places 4 bets at once? Because from what I remember, he only said he KNOWS of 4 consistent winning bets, including his own, which he says is the best of them all.

Not that he places 4 bets on the table like you understood it.
Do correct me if I'm wrong though.

All the best.

Your friend,
Marven

[HansHuckebein]

it doesn't seem to lose all of the time. this is a also a wiesbaden session. i know, it's just one session. but it's a session I picked randomly. 

[MAX]

Hi Guys

In the the downloads roulette related part on page 5 there is a method called 18-10 method.
This method explains the basics on playing black\odd and red\even

[smiley=flags/SouthAfrica.jpg]


Regards
MAX

[Carlitos]

.......... can you place the link here Max?? I can not find it in the download area... 






Carlitos 

[Worm]

Carlitos----->nolinks://vlsroulette.com/downloads/?sa=view;id=21

[Carlitos]

Thanks Worm 








Carlitos 

[Worm]

Anytime Carlitos

[JHM]

Lanky,

Your first link to the post, at the bottom stands this:

Hi I hope you don't mind me posting this info, I was reading your posts about this system you were talking about. Thanks

That doesn't seem a post of Charles.

His second post, are some posts directly copied from page 11 of the site.

But maybe you're right. He'd only make 2 posts in this topic since signing up.

[Ka2]

Hi Ka2 mate,

Can you please show me where he says that he places 4 bets at once? Because from what I remember, he only said he KNOWS of 4 consistent winning bets, including his own, which he says is the best of them all.

Not that he places 4 bets on the table like you understood it.
Do correct me if I'm wrong though.

All the best.

Your friend,
Marven

I said 4 bets in total, not all at once  . So following the last result, would mean more than 4 bets, so obviously that's not charles his bet. 

And like charles said, if you think you have a good formula, test it for 30 sessions, with about 100 spins each. If you win (almost) every session, then its consistent. Testing only 1 session, means absolutly nothing.

And please, for the last time, lets try to follow the clues and the facts. I think were going a bit for a wild goose chase here...

[zeus]

Zeus,  I am still studying the roulette extreme. Can you please add progression below to your system:.

For all of  those even bets,  use progression 1,1,2,3,4 only when  winning, i,e,  add 1 more unit after the second win till the 5th. Restart the progression if after the 5th spins it still wins or till we lose.

PH



 

@PH
You are trying to beat the odds not the game as Charles says.
Anyway here is the code.
I hope you find something interesting.
At least you can learn some simple RX commands.

[redhot]

guys im am the only one here that had any contact with this guy he gave only one bet that he showed his movment concept and his past results concept on page 5   where the question was ask about movement  look at the wheel results and it will give results across the table  he used follow the last results on the streets  taking the last 5 results and going from there  he said that is not the bet that the acetf uses he show an  example of this bettin g 25 dollar units   and saying something like i was playing this while waitng for a friend and showing a profit  with in a hour play. he is playing inside bets i have no clue after a year and a half it is a waist of time but iam not on to give up gave my mind somthing to do while recovering from a mixed martial arts fight injury. so  what im saying here is following the last result    on the inside bets  why on the inside because i asked him that question on where am i betting inside or out side he said in side go and check the thread on his email to me  on page 6 of this thread .

Guys, its a "constructed" inside bet, eg, covering certain numbers (I think 18 or less)

Its flat betting - NO PROGRESSION AT ALL

It doesn't win every spin, its been known to lose 6 in a row

It traps the "runs" AND the "changes" but "not all" the changes

Lets work with what we've got, like Ka2 says I think we're going off in the wrong direction, we need to focus on what we've got here, there's no point testing a system with a progression if we know charles' bet doesnt use one!

No disrespect guys, I'm glad evryones joining in here but lets keep on the right track.

[HansHuckebein]

redhot, was makes you so sure that is an inside bet?

[mistarlupo]

Strange... why don't he use a progression, what do you think?
'cause if he has "bet" that gives him an advantage progressions DO work long term!

Also "its been known to lose 6" maximum, so it's stupid not to use progression.

Maybe you've got one more clue... you cannot use progression on this [series of] bet(s).

I personally believe this guy is bs'-ing you fellas, and I'm sure he is reading this forum...

Anyway, good luck!

[redhot]

redhot, was makes you so sure that is an inside bet?

Tino emailed charles asking where to bet inside or outside and charles replied inside.

[redhot]

-