HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[Marven]

Hi Ernesto.

If it is a consistent winning bet he don't need to quit when up, in the next 50-100-200 spins he can reach higher up and so on, because it win more than lose.

From what he said, he could go down at times. BUT, he always wins in the end of the session.

Finish with double win? Two wins in a row? Or Double bankroll?

In his website, he quite clearly states that he would for example aim for winning 12 units, and (if he runs into a bad streak) never quit without at least 3 units in the plus, or in the case of his bet, 2 units in the plus.

I shall quote his words as evidence:

If we were going for say a 12 point profit hit and after 7 or 8 ahead we hit a bad sequence, we would not go below 3 points win. We quit at 3 points win.

...you must finish your session with at least 2 consecutive wins. Never on a losing bet.
The difference is a small fortune. I won't do the maths for you...do it yourself

Regards,
Marven

[ernesto]

Thanks Marven this explanation!

ernesto

[WARRIOR]

could it mean that something should happen more often but it doesnt to quote him, mean that every number should come out every   37 spins but it doesnt.just a thought.

[Ka2]

could it mean that something should happen more often but it doesn't to quote him, mean that every number should come out every   37 spins but it doesn't.just a thought.

Thats what I was thinking too.

[ernesto]

Guys!

I think this page about how we can test our bet is very important too.

On page 10.

TESTING YOUR BET ?

Lets assume you have engineered a bet you think is worth testing further. Testing is a very important act you need to do before wasting a single penny betting.

As many of you will know, you can get fantastic results with some tests only to find flaws later. Testing is not for the weak, it can be soul destroying. Nevertheless if you wish to be successful you must have a bet that is truly reliable over long periods.

I have always, and still do advocate at least 30 sessions of planned exact betting to "PROVE" a bet.

IE. Forget about "Hit and run" or any stop points. Forget about the stop near the end with 2 consecutive wins. You should judge the performance over say exactly 100 spins for each of the 30 sessions.

Test to the last number. This will give you a genuine average.

I would accept that if 29 of those gave me a decent profit return and that only one lost less that 15% of my playing bank, I would have a consistent bet.

You must set your own standards, but beware the lower your standard is nearer to gambling.! Be safe, Be critical

Now and only now at this stage can you look at the professional ways to "Enhance" the already built-in profit of your bet. There is much info. on that throughout this site.

THIS IS THE CORRECT WAY....DO NOT DO IT ANY OTHER WAY

ernesto

[New Ken]

good posts, guys---and Tino's idea above about the 37/38 number thing is very interesting. I always think Hampshire gave us a good clue when he spoke about "something in the game that should happen more often but does not", from which he formulated his bet.

Of course, most of us are aware that on average 24/25 numbers of the 38 play every 38 spins.
It's pretty constant, one of the few things in the game you can rely upon, and I've tried all sorts of things to take advantage of the fact---to no avail, so far.

Only system I've seen do it, and which still remains a possible winning system to my mind is "raindrops"--- found on Turbo's site.

Good thinking, guys.

New Ken!

[Carlitos]

Tino, if every number should come out every 37 spins would it then be random?? As he says on his website, you need to take advantage of the randomness.




Carlitos 

[redhot]

Tino, if every number should come out every 37 spins would it then be random?? As he says on his website, you need to take advantage of the randomness.




Carlitos 

Surely the fact that it DOESN'T do whats expected, makes it random.

[TwoCatSam]

Ah, yes, but what is expected?

[WARRIOR]

what does he mean better then the odd rate .

[pighead]

good posts, guys---and Tino's idea above about the 37/38 number thing is very interesting. I always think Hampshire gave us a good clue when he spoke about "something in the game that should happen more often but does not", from which he formulated his bet.

Of course, most of us are aware that on average 24/25 numbers of the 38 play every 38 spins.
It's pretty constant, one of the few things in the game you can rely upon, and I've tried all sorts of things to take advantage of the fact---to no avail, so far.

Only system I've seen do it, and which still remains a possible winning system to my mind is "raindrops"--- found on Turbo's site.

Good thinking, guys.

New Ken!

the raindrop system makes perfect sense..bet on the majority of the sleeping # and also repeaters..

Not sure if it can pass charles's test in 30 sessions. I am giving it a try..

Ph

[WARRIOR]

pig head let me no hpw you make out

[Marven]

pig head let me no hpw you make out

Hahahahahah LMAO

Sorry dear Tino I couldn't help it.

We say "let me know how you do".
How he 'makes out' might not be exactly what you wanna know.

what does he mean better then the odd rate .

It means a winning rate that overcomes the odds embedded by the house to their favor.

Cheers mate!
Marven

[WARRIOR]

marven do you believe that this guy won this kind of money ask your self this question if you were a millionare would you be wasting your time creating a web sight  about this bet that won millions on roulette  casinos have been around along time its not like they want to be peolpes friends so im not sure what this guy means or his intentions  he does have alot of good points but nothing that is not on this forum that is new .but if i did win millions on roulette i would wright a book on it  ,and what would i care now im retired who gives a shit about casinos there the biggest scum of the earth .that is the question .anyways i will still keep working on this magical bet .cheers

[Marven]

Tino,

I hear ya mate.

If you want my personal opinion on this, you will find it in my first post in the first page of this thread.

Is he for real?
Maybe, maybe not. It's as simple as that. I don't spend the day thinking about it.

Will his website make people (especially roulette players) think in a good, productive, maybe new direction?
Yes, I believe so.

All the best,
Marven

[Marven]

-