HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[Wally Gator]

Batman?  Spiderman?  Give me a break !!  Obviously you guys have not watched an episode of Wally Gator ......

Off topic?  No question about it!

[Worm]

Nah..like Topcat more

[TwoCatSam]

Oh, so off topic...what was it anyway?...

Ren and Stimpy?

Sam

[New Ken]

Oh, hell---maybe we all deserve a little humour break here; it HAS been a quite a journey (viewed over 8000 times).

I mean, we have not been able to come up with a consistently LOSING bet that we could switch around, guys, far less a winning one.

We need help from...The God Of Roulette!

Anybody got his number...?


 

[Marven]

We need help from...The God Of Roulette!

Yep, just add up the wheels numbers and you'll get his number.

@JHM, that bet looks promising mate, well done. I will give it a try.

[Marven]

Batman?  Spiderman?  Give me a break !!  Obviously you guys have not watched an episode of Wally Gator ......

Nah..like Topcat more

Oh, so off topic...what was it anyway?...

Ren and Stimpy?

You guys are awesome.

[New Ken]

Yeah, JHM. But I'd like to use this thread to study/decipher Hamphire's bet.

[JHM]

Marven,

Did some more testing, approx 2.000 spins now. Seems that in every session a point comes were you are in plus. And no sessions lost so far. So I decided to give it a go. I transferred 10,- into my account and place 1 bet everyday of 2,- on 5 lines. I made a mistake I put 1,- on every line. Than I decided to play another round, waited patiently and bet again and lost. Bad luck . Than I recovered and lost patience and did some stupid bets. Good lesson, I need to control my patience. If I had stick to the rules I would have won 2,- and my play for today was done a win like planned.

Ken,

You're right. Lets keep focusses to that........

[New Ken]

When Hampshire talks about "a bet within a bet", he mentions a bet that doesn't win or lose, then adds "one more clever move".

He also says, "There's nothing complicated about the bets you can find" when we look at the moves (in an unconventional way, of course, but I'll get back to that..)

So I'm thinking, a bet that that neither wins nor loses could be: an even bet (odd/even, B/R, 1-18/19-36).

And some other bet within that bet (a doz or column, for example: 1-18 and 1st doz--y'know along those lines...)

What do you guys think.

NEW KEN

[New Ken]

Now, an unconventional even bet could be a manufactured 18, and not the regular couple (1-18/19-36).

And someone here did say he "remanufactured the results", I think.

[New Ken]

And I truly believe we need to understand what "unconventional moves", or "looking in an unconventional way" means, for us to really proceed in the right direction regarding this bet.

Some focus on that is necessary, I think.

[JHM]

Also at the bottom of his page 15

AND NOW AS A REWARD FOR READING THIS FAR:

OUR BET IS "A SIMPLE "TRAP" BET.
A BET THAT TRAP ENOUGH WINNERS TO GIVE EACH SESSION A VERY GOOD PROFIT.  WE LOVE RANDOMNESS!   STOP LOOKING AT THE MATHS.
IT TRULY IS THAT SIMPLE !
He also says that he found the bet by default. And that the bet isn't complicated. But, how can an inside bet not be complicated?

I have checked different 'inside' bets:
- bet/follow the last 3 DS
- bet the 4 DS on spin 2,3,4 and 5 (Idea behind this was the last double street doesn't repeat often)
- bet the last 6 single streets
- Mark the dozen and columns and when you have a identical duo like 1-1, 2-2, 3-3 bet that 2 lines.
- Follow al EC's + dozen and columns from the last nr.

Now, I don't know what Charles calls easy, maybe he's a great thinker.

Ken/others what possibilities have you checked so far?

[kompressor]

TRAP
VERY GOOD PROFIT
RANDOMNESS   
STOP LOOKING AT THE MATHS
IT TRULY IS THAT SIMPLE


bet on one or a few numbers and this must show good profits in average...i dont think its a 5 to 1 bet....it should pay when your "trap" hits

[WARRIOR]

no his bet uses no progression  and loses on occasion 6 in a row.

[hoper35]

There's no need to fear - - - Underdog is here.

[hoper35]

-