HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[sniper]

Hello Carlitos,

I believe Diarmaid and a few others had done a lot of testing and actual betting using 6 sectors on another forum.They were betting on dominant sector using a mild progression.Initially they did very well and finally the whole post was taken down.I can't figure out what actually happened.Perhaps someone can shed some light on this matter.

Regards

sniper

[Arvis]

Hi Guys,

I wrote some very simple code in RX (just bought the program) for betting on the "Perfect Run"  and "1/2 Run, 1/2 Change"
I'm still testing real spins.

Have fun,

Arvis

system "Charles?"
{
  Bet on the "Perfect Run"  and "1/2 Run, 1/2 Change"
}

method "main"
begin
    if Black has hit each time
    and Even has hit each time
    begin
        put 1 unit on List [Number 2, Number 4, Number 6, Number 8, Number 10, Number 11, Number 12, Number 13, Number 14, Number 15, Number 16, Number 17, Number 18, Number 20, Number 22, Number 24, Number 26, Number 28, Number 29, Number 30, Number 31, Number 32, Number 33, Number 34, Number 35, Number 36]
    end
   
    if Black has hit each time
    and Odd has hit each time
    begin
        put 1 unit on List [Number 1, Number 2, Number 3, Number 4, Number 5, Number 6, Number 7, Number 8, Number 9, Number 10, Number 11, Number 13, Number 15, Number 17, Number 19, Number 20, Number 21, Number 22, Number 23, Number 24, Number 25, Number 26, Number 27, Number 28, Number 29, Number 31, Number 33, Number 35]
    end
   
    if Red has hit each time
    and Even has hit each time
    begin
        put 1 unit on List [Number 1, Number 2, Number 3, Number 4, Number 5, Number 6, Number 7, Number 8, Number 9, Number 10, Number 12, Number 14, Number 16, Number 18, Number 19, Number 20, Number 21, Number 22, Number 23, Number 24, Number 25, Number 26, Number 27, Number 28, Number 30, Number 32, Number 34, Number 36]
    end
   
    if Red has hit each time
    and Odd has hit each time
    begin
        put 1 unit on List [Number 1, Number 3, Number 5, Number 7, Number 9, Number 11, Number 12, Number 13, Number 14, Number 15, Number 16, Number 17, Number 18, Number 19, Number 21, Number 23, Number 25, Number 27, Number 29, Number 30, Number 31, Number 32, Number 33, Number 34, Number 35, Number 36]
    end
end

[pighead]

Hi All,

here is the latest name list of  the team.

pighead
JHM
redhot
Charles
New Ken
Carlitos
Ka2
ernesto
Madupz4
Moccoman
Wally Gator
sniper
Spinman
zeus
Marven

[pighead]

In order  to test out the bet, we will need to use real spin # instead of RNG.

we can either load some spins to RX or use live casino to test out the new bet.

[Carlitos]

Hello Sniper,





I did not follow that........... Perhaps it is something......






Carlitos  

[Moccoman]

Hi Guys,

I think a lot are reading far more into this and getting way way off track!

To hopefully regroup:
1. It doesn't work on RNG.
2. It exploits the randomness of the wheel.
3. It uses the table movements, not the wheel.
4. It is a "simple trap" bet.
5. It is an "unconventional" bet

Now for more:

1. On his site using "Wayback" for 20/10/07, he states "How many BLACK colours in the centre column and RED numbers in the third. How many RED+ODD or BLACK+EVENS or RED+EVENS or BLACK+ODDS?"

2. Then later says "There is a "Reason" I have not published all the "differentials" about the roulette wheels and layouts. This is because they are "conventional" and only serve to confuse. Do not follow this route, look for the "Opposite" in all you find. There is "Good Reason" to do so."

3. His new offer requires the person to have 3,000 units in their currency. As he has said that you need to divide your bankroll by 20 to work out individual bets, then the bet is 150 units, which I believe to be 50 units on 3 locations.

4. The key is to find "something that should happen more often ... a lot more often, but doesn't.

My conclusions:

1. We only have to find a bet that wins over exactly 100 spins - no more, no less. Then we need to test that bet over 30 sessions of exactly 100 spins to prove it.

2. Both Red + First and Third columns and Black + First and Second columns give 1 more winner than loser over the 37 numbers.

3. The bet takes into account the opposite of the last spin of the wheel, hopefully, I guess, so the same number is not spun. But, of course, it will happen sometimes.

4. The bet also takes into account "movements across the table". This I have taken to be, as an example, the last 2 spins are (19) first column and (2) second column, will there be a greater chance of the third column then hitting, or not?

5. With everyone looking at the same "Real" 100 spins, maybe a couple of scenarios can develop and these can be then tested over another 29 x 100 spin sessions.

Regards
Mocco

[JHM]

Mocco,

Good post, you're right. We went (I can only speak for myself) on the wrong track.

I have done several tests with columns, and all failed  . For example: wait for 2 different columns and dozen to hit in two turns, then bet the missing column and dozen to make the series complete. It failed.
Other example: mark the dozen in 1,2,3 and columns also. Wait for a dozen and column combination with the same number like nr. 1 = dozen 1 and column 1. Now bet dozen and column 1, idea behind this is that not move will jump. It failed.
Not to mention all the other bets on streets, double streets, dozens, columns, red, black, odd, even, 1-18, 19-36.

[Marven]

Good post Mocco.

I would like to comment on something though.

He did not say that his bet doesn't work on RNG, he just implied that online casino RNG's are rigged and his and any other bet will fail on them eventually.

My personal experience leaves me with no choice but to believe in this. Online casino RNG's are most likely one big scam.

Regards,
Marven

[HansHuckebein]

8 days of wiesbaden, betting as flat as paris hilton's ass.  .

what do you think, guys?

[Marven]

8 days of wiesbaden, betting as flat as paris hilton's ass.  .

Man, I laughed my arse off at this! hahahahah

THANKS

[Marven]

So if i read it well Mocco, then we should not follow the colours route as you say that he said,

Looks like I was right about it. [smiley=happy.gif]



Cheers,
Marven

[dancer4k]

I just noticed, that was reply number 666.

Well hello mate,
You're not the first one to say so here.

I personally share Ka2 opinion on this. I learned a lot since I first read his website, and still.
Real or not, he's a great source of inspiration on many levels.

Regards,
Marven

yeah, admittedly charles does present basically sound advice for any type of roulette player...new or experienced. but really it's nothing that a serious player couldn't or hasn't already established by his own common sense and through trial and error. it's good that you're learning from him...maybe i was a bit harsh in my initial post.  i'm just aggravated because he doesn't actually give any clear hints for finding a consistent bet...which is why i think he's a windbag and hence i can't see the point of his site. and £52million seems like a huge exaggeration to me.  anyway, i hope you manage to infiltrate his "circle of trust" and start milking those casinos. good luck mates!

[New Ken]

whew--I wasn't here for the weekend, but you guys had a real jam! Glad to know i've been included in the Hunting Party.
Almost ALL that stuff over the last few pages surely has merit, I think. Certainly there must be other winning bets or sytems than Charles' own.
But we're trying to see if Charles' bet exists, and distractions ought to be guarded against in the process, eh?

Uh, Charles said in his research of other people's systems, he has come across something called 'Cross combination results' (which, he adds, doesn't exist...).

Ah, anybody here ever heard the term?

I'm asking for a PARTICULAR REASON...


NEW KEN

[JHM]

Ken your back. Great mate. Charles has his trust, we have our own and yes offcourse you're included.

We will find that bet.

[New Ken]

Thanks, JHM---and of course we will ...

you ever heard of "cross combination results"...?

[New Ken]

-