HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[New Ken]

TINO, great idea of yours---I like it...and it can probably be developed.

NEW KEN

[New Ken]

cHARLES said, "THERE IS NOTHING COMPLICATED ABOUT THE BETS YOU CAN FIND..."----when you make a list of all the moves that can happen.

Hmm... 

[Adriatik]

results are looking prety good!

What is bankroll when you sum all ? And how exactly did you play ?

[Moccoman]

Hi JHM,

When looking at 1 unit on colour and 2 units each on the 2 columns (Total 5), the result when looking at all 37 numbers is -2.7% - as it is for all computations.

However, on the site he says to ignore the maths and look at trapping the winners.

So to answer your question,
14 x +3
10 x +1
4  x -3
9  x -5

[New Ken]

Hey guys, here's something I (shamelessly ) ripped off another site. It's pretty close to what I'm experimenting with...

It begins:

"Quoted Text

Try this one:
only play outside (dozen/column, red/black, even/odd, small/big)
Always place your bets on last winner. If win then repeat, if loose double up.
On dozen/column always bet 2 dozens and columns, depends on where is the previous hit. (The middle is always covered!)
Example:
Black 26 come out next round your bet will be:
1 unit on black
1 unit on even
1 unit on big numbers
1-1 units 2nd/3rd dozen
1-1 units 2nd/3rd column
------------------------------
7 units total your max winning is 12 unit

I made 78 units profit within 67 spins.

Give a try! And don't forget: always play on the winner! "




NEW KEN

[New Ken]

Of course, it's only here for food for thought...I'm not into doubling up on this thread.

Sheesh, I feel even more idiotic than usual

[JHM]

Hans, maybe we didn't understand your thought right. Adriatk welcome to the thread and thank you for thinking with us. It's good to see more people are combining thoughts. Adriatk your bet looks interesting. Hans sorry for not understanding you right if this is what you mentioned.

How did your testing went hans?

[JHM]

Of course, it's only here for food for thought...I'm not into doubling up on this thread.

Sheesh, I feel even more idiotic than usual

Ken,

Something small can lead to something big.

[jamesd]

Charles mentions that in 13 years of playing he occasionally has had a losing streak of 6. If we suppose he has placed something like 250,000 bets during that time and his longest losing run is 6, then his bet must cover, (and I'm guessing here, a mathematician might tell us exactly) around 80/85% of the wheel.

I may be wrong but whatever the percentage is, it would make sense to concentrate on bets that produce that percentage.

[madupz4]

Charles mentions that in 13 years of playing he occasionally has had a losing streak of 6. If we suppose he has placed something like 250,000 bets during that time and his longest losing run is 6, then his bet must cover, (and I'm guessing here, a mathematician might tell us exactly) around 80/85% of the wheel.

I may be wrong but whatever the percentage is, it would make sense to concentrate on bets that produce that percentage.

Excellent point!

[WARRIOR]

jhm how are you doing on our serch

[JHM]

Tino I'm fine, check your messages.

[Ka2]

By the way, why are we still posting on this thread? I thought we were going to form a private group?

[JHM]

Ka,

How are we going to form the private group?

Maybe we can ask Victor to lock, and acces with a password?

[Ka2]

Marven and Pighead came up with that idea...

[Ka2]

-