HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[JHM]

We can ask Victor to give us a section. Like Enrique, Turbo etc. Which can only be viewed / visited by members who are allowed. But then again, we have no new members joining and fresh views?

What do we do guys?

[pighead]

Hi JHM and KA,

Marven and I are building the place for the team and need your inputs.. and I will send you guys the link later..

We won't leave forum and will continue the discussion here.

PH

[JHM]

That's great. Because all new thought and members are offcourse more than welcome 

[pighead]

That's great. Because all new thought and members are offcourse more than welcome 

Hi JHM and other team membersL

at this point, please be patient as there are a lot of works we need to do before we kick off our little project..

As promised, Marven and I will send out the invitation later.. I will post what I've found in these days as my contribution to the group.

I followed this thread these two days. It seems like we already lost focus on Charles bet but are developing our new bets.

One thing I found is about lateral thinking, you may find the info below pretty inspiring:

nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_thinking

Random Entry: Choose an object at random, or a noun from a dictionary, and associate that with the area you are thinking about. This is also called the method of focal objects.

For example imagine you are thinking about how to improve Wikipedia. Choosing an object at random from an office you might see a fax machine. A fax machine transmits images over the phone to paper. Fax machines are becoming rare. People send faxes directly to known phone numbers. Perhaps this makes you think of providing ways to embed wiki articles in emails and other websites, as is done with YouTube videos. Does it stimulate other Wikipedia ideas for you?

PH

[ChipChip]

Hi all,
it is a surprise to see this thread keep going and going......
so may I jump on the bandwagon and travel along?May I?

Please remember this:
Charles said "it is a flat bet!"
and
NEVER INCREASE OR DECREASE YOUR BET IN ANY SESIONS.

Therefore
if you think you have THE BET
but you are using "progession".

Eventually,It is not the winning bet we are searching for.
Every time I try some new bet,but later I had to use Progression to sustain it,I just throw it away.
Please comment.

Boy,I  just bought another bottle of ADVIL.....

[Carlitos]

ChipChip, off course you may  You already have enlighten this threat with your post.






Carlitos 

[JHM]

jhm how are you doing on our serch

Tino,

I tested 2 sessions:

100 spins: +10
115 spins: +10

[ernesto]

Tino!

I did test with 545 numbers from DublinBet. When the first dozen appear I play 2 and 3 column, when second I play 1 and 3 column and so on.

Are you playing this way?

My results -16 unit at the end. Which is not too bad to this long session.

ernesto

[JHM]

Ernesto,

Thats near the house edge 

545 / 100 * 2,7 = 14,72

[madupz4]

Guys and dolls,


I was just fooling around with the movements...... I tried to bet on the rng with numbers on the same line.


For example, lett's take 22, ( LOL ). In 2d dozen it's the 4th line. Then bet all the 4th lines of every dozen. If an other line comes up, bet it also..... i had an good run. Then i decided to see whether i could use less bets.


So i counted per 2 lines instead of 4 lines of every dozen. Also had an great run.


For example, 1 is the first of the 1,2,3 and 4,5,6 lines. So in this column i would bet 1,7, 13, 19 etc..... When for example 18 comes up i would bet the 2 numbers of the 3d column.


Again i did great.




Could it be that the movements have to do on which lines the numbers are?? I did not use progression. Off course it could be that i had an great run but somehow the idea of looking if the numbers or somehow on the same line intriges me......





Carlitos 

I fooled around with the same method a few days ago.  It has its winning streaks, but it also has its losing streaks.  I tested about 300 spins and I didn't make any noticable profit.  I also tried it with double streets, and with single streets of the dominating color.

For example there are 12 lines on the table.  6 of the lines are dominated by BLACK (meaning there are 2 blacks and 1 red in the line), and 6 of the lines are dominated by RED.  I tried betting the dominate one, the last one, and then finally I tried betting the dominate one (1 unit on each line for 6 units total) and 6 units on the opposite color.  (ex:  1 unit on all dominate BLACK lines, + 6 units on the even chance RED).

This works from time to time but again it was inconsistent.  Perhaps we can mess around with it and come up with different results, such as betting the opposite, or using a LW registry.

[madupz4]

Reference to "looking at clues on the table" and "lateral thinking," I noticed something on the table that may be able to be taken advantage of, or maybe not?

Everyone knows there are exactly 6 double streets on the table correct?

If you look at the table closely, you will notice that there are 3 IDENTICAL "pairs" of double streets on the table in regards to the exact red/black color placement.  This is something I never noticed before until I looked closer.

Look at the table closely:

Double streets 123456, is identical to double street 19,20,21,22,23,24.
Double street  7,8,9,10,11,12 is identical to double street 25,26,27,28,29,30.
Double street 13,14,15,16,17,18 is ID to double street 31,32,33,34,35,36.

I've been trying different methods to see if any patterns or trends develop, to see if differernt pairs stay hot or cold and looking for repeats, but i've just started. 

If anyone wants to see if this can be taken advantage of.....Lets get testing!

[redhot]

Reference to "looking at clues on the table" and "lateral thinking," I noticed something on the table that may be able to be taken advantage of, or maybe not?

Everyone knows there are exactly 6 double streets on the table correct?

If you look at the table closely, you will notice that there are 3 IDENTICAL "pairs" of double streets on the table in regards to the exact red/black color placement.  This is something I never noticed before until I looked closer.

Look at the table closely:

Double streets 123456, is identical to double street 19,20,21,22,23,24.
Double street  7,8,9,10,11,12 is identical to double street 25,26,27,28,29,30.
Double street 13,14,15,16,17,18 is ID to double street 31,32,33,34,35,36.

I've been trying different methods to see if any patterns or trends develop, to see if differernt pairs stay hot or cold and looking for repeats, but i've just started. 

If anyone wants to see if this can be taken advantage of.....Lets get testing!

I also noticed this, you could fold the table in half exactly at number 18 and get perfect symmetry. 19 - 36 is an exact copy of 1- 18

[madupz4]

I also noticed this, you could fold the table in half exactly at number 18 and get perfect symmetry. 19 - 36 is an exact copy of 1- 18

I disagree.  I don't think it is perfect symmetry when folded in half.  Look at the table closely....

Line 10,11,12 would have to be identical to Line 25,26,27 and it's not, it's different.

Line 789 would have to be identical to line 28,29,30 and it's different.  Other than those 2 differences, each half of the table is the same.

[New Ken]

regarding the "codes" i posted ( i believe it's on page 26): we had 30 codes for 36 nos.

So I thought the "best" code to tackle would be RED, 1-18, ODD, 1ST DOZ, 3rd COLUMN.

I did a run of 50 spins and the results were interesting so far...(need to find the time!)

NEW KEN

[redhot]

I disagree.  I don't think it is perfect symmetry when folded in half.  Look at the table closely....

Line 10,11,12 would have to be identical to Line 25,26,27 and it's not, it's different.

Line 789 would have to be identical to line 28,29,30 and it's different.  Other than those 2 differences, each half of the table is the same.

Yes sorry, i must of missed that

[redhot]

-