HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[New Ken]

( I love conspiracies )

[ernesto]

Ernesto,
We need to organize the workflow, from filtering the ideas to testing the selection..bouncing ideas is not enough.

that's why Marven and I build the team to do that.. We need to find the bet in a more " professional" way!!

Hi Pighead!

I absolutely agree with you! We have to make a plan or a priority order to work effective.
Try to found what can be the base of this bet? I think it is the randomness. I try to understand how can be the randomness our advantage. How its work.

That is only my thought.

ernesto

[pighead]

Hi Pighead!

I absolutely agree with you! We have to make a plan or a priority order to work effective.
Try to found what can be the base of this bet? I think it is the randomness. I try to understand how can be the randomness our advantage. How its work.

That is only my thought.

ernesto

To answer your question, how to take the advantage of randomness? I have my answer when we kick off  our working group even though I am not sure if the idea is right or not. But I have my answer..

[New Ken]

aH, Here I go again...


Got me a bet, 3 units per spin---35 times broke even---finished at +12 after 100 spins.

And, yeah, you could say it's a bet within a bet.


  L 99--------W =111-----35 EVENS
      WON 12 ---    100 SP


Most losses in a row 2/3 and some are not "total" losses either.

Of course, it's too simple to really be the bet---and too early to tell.


Keep you guys posted, and if/when it fails, I'll break my rule this time and show you what it was about---if it matters.


NEW KEN!

[ernesto]

Now I try this way:

Catch the Runs and Changes with the last number.

23 - R-O-H-2.col-1.doz
11 - B-O-L-2.col-2.doz

In this example two properties are same (odd and 2. column)
In very few spins are all the five properties same to the previous spin, and also very few are totally different.

From 374 spin
[table=,]
0,32x
1,61x
2,143x
3,81x
4,45x
5,11x
[/table]

Number of same characteristic with the previous spin is in the first column.
How many times this happen in the second column.

As you can see the most appear combination when the number has 2 same characteristic (2 Run) with the previous and, of course, 3 different (3 Changes). Average at every 3. spin you can see 2 same and 3 different characteristic with the previous number.

So that happen more often. But this is still reading the past result and not really "unconventional".

ernesto

[WARRIOR]

pighead im not sure if you got my messege

[redhot]

When is this group for testing and research starting? and will it be a section on this forum?

[iboba]

my dear mates,.....WHY,DO YOU THINK,SYSTEM ISNT FOR SALE??

[WARRIOR]

how do you mean

[WARRIOR]

there is a story that says that the inventor of roulette went crazy trying to beat the wheel. maybe we will all go crazy

[Moccoman]

Hi iboba,

Take your point, but what would it be worth?

If it was sold for $10, it would be considered a joke, $1,000 a scammer and $1,000,000, well also a joke.

In any case, even though the bet may not exist, a lot of people will be better off for knowing some more about the game.

Regards
Mocco

[WARRIOR]

moccom i agree im much more careful about betting

[WARRIOR]

moccomon  lets go back to the email charles sent on page 9 of this thread he used a bet to test rng he said to me that the bet is an example of a no win no lose bet  he said not to use it it will lose in the long run ok thats fine the bet was 2 dozen and to colums at the same time  .  if people here are willing to put some work into all the no win no lose bet they can think of and post them  so we see how they perform  but my feeling on this is not all but some are not wiling to do the tesing   beacuse my last bet that i posted not many test came from that  but i did say that we had to find another bet   to compliment that . anyways that bet did not follow the run and distacted me from all the email from charles  so i had to gather my thoughts and get back to the puzzle.   my idea is this no win no loss there  is a reason why he used that bet for testing ,2  movement the hamshire 5 bet   he remanufactred the past results for those who did not see that page in 2008  basically took the the last results and played the steet bet went from street to steet and looked for a reapeat  . noe we have a no win no lose  and movement bet   marven did say something about   more winners than loser   and charles did say somthing that should happen more . now  ok more winners then loser my idea is follow the last 2 dozen and 2 collums that come in thats the first bet second part using movement  i will test odd and even and move with the last result and see what happens moocomon i no you test the three locations  ad another bet  and move with it  the movent can be done with any loction so im going to work on that . we can test the no win no lose bet stationary and just use the movement bet to see what happens

[iboba]

How do I mean????you ask,my dear mate,Charles.I know it,but do you?

[WARRIOR]

IBOBA WHAT EXACTLY ARE YOU TRY TO SAY I DONT UNDERSTAND .

[WARRIOR]

-