HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[pighead]

Hi guys,


how do you define a run and a change? 


PH

[WARRIOR]

pighead  go on to monte carlo anedotes page 81 the author system thats the only thing i can find and 302 systems  just go down the list to runs.hope this helps.

[pighead]

Charles, what I meant was CEH's "run and change". He said we need to trap run and change but not all


"This may sound like a contradiction, but it is not. There are patterns or a better description would be random series, short and long formed by the pure randomness. Trapping the runs, and trapping the changes quickly enough (not all) but at a better than the odds rate will make you a winner.

There lies the greatest clue I can give you. I had by default found the answer to randomness by finding a bet that was able to use the "Runs" and the "Changes" to advantage. You need both. One without the other is a recipe for disaster."

[ernesto]

Hi guys,


how do you define a run and a change? 


PH

Hi Pighead!

I asked it before, but nobody respond. Maybe nobody knows it exactly.

A few weeks ago I tought that runs and changes are when color/dozen/etc. runs or changes.
RRR runs, LHLH changes. But now I think it is really conventional thinking.

I don't think so the real runs and changes are these BBB/OEOE...

ernesto

[HansHuckebein]

formations like BRBRBRBR would you call them a run or a change?

[ernesto]

formations like BRBRBRBR would you call them a run or a change?

I call it changes. It can be continuous until the last repeat and it switch to run BR->RRR.

Your example is a "runs of changes" with my words  When the changes are run and run.

But I'm affraid this way is very, very conventional!

ernesto

[HansHuckebein]

well, regarding RBRBRBRB as changes would be coventional. regarding RBRBRBRB as a run might not be unconventional but i think is a bit less conventional. 

so RRRRRR, BBBBBB. RBBRBRB would all be runs, wouldn't they?

[redhot]

well, regarding RBRBRBRB as changes would be coventional. regarding RBRBRBRB as a run might not be unconventional but i think is a bit less conventional. 

so RRRRRR, BBBBBB. RBBRBRB would all be runs, wouldn't they?

Yes so RRRRRR would be a RUN of repeats
RBRBRBRB would be a RUN of chops
RRRBRBBBR would be a CHANGE

[WARRIOR]

ernesto do you really think that he s covering the runs and the changes at the same time .hedging a bet seems ok but it would seem you take less profit  at times i could be wrong.

[JHM]

Guys,

Don't spent time to runs on the EC's. I have tested (on colors). And when a mixed result come in you'll lose your winning in no time.

Example

B +0
R +1
R +0
B +1
R +2
B +3
B +2
R +3
R +2
B +3
R +4
R +2
R +1
R

[WARRIOR]

hi jhm im trying it this way he says we have to deafeat one of the traps im using the rbrb runs and changes but on the colums when r comes in i bet the 1 and 2nd colum  when black comes i bet 1 and 3 .all we can do is keep trying

[HansHuckebein]

jhm

what was your bet selection?

[JHM]

On what bet?

[ernesto]

ernesto do you really think that he s covering the runs and the changes at the same time .hedging a bet seems ok but it would seem you take less profit  at times i could be wrong.

I think in only red/black you can't cover runs and changes together, because these are opposite.

It is possible to cover the runs and changes same time, but with least two different properties.
For example:

32-R-E-H
14-R-E-L

At the next bet try to trap the RR Runs with the EE Runs and the HL Changes. So bet R+E+H. In this case you hope all of runs and changes go on.

This way not working for long term

ernesto

[HansHuckebein]

on the example you gave 2 posts above

[HansHuckebein]

-