Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

Started by JHM, November 28, 2008, 01:47:41 PM

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

WARRIOR

what kind of bank r is needed you must be using progressive betting.you said after 10 years of winning with the bet used it tanked .and waiting for 12 spins for a line or steet not to show its kind of a gamblers fallacy dont you think just my opion mate.

Marven

I don't want to oppose my forum mate iboba here, but in my opinion, how much you need in terms of value is not important.
The important is that you have enough units to ride out any possible dispersions.

Any GENUINE playing method should NOT absolutely REQUIRE more than 1000 or let's say a safe 3000 units as a starting capital.

Regards,
Marven

rjl

Quote from: Werdna on February 08, 2009, 01:39:44 PM

RJL are the numbers already in the worksheet from livespins?


They're from a real session at Dublinbet, table 1


JHM

Quote from: CHARLES on February 08, 2009, 07:07:59 PM
about 20.000 dollars

Tino,

Don't let anyone ever tell you to play with that money. It's a lot of money and a loser will lose it all in no time. Big progression will fail, sooner or later. If it are savings please keep the money in your pocket and continue brainstorming the bet we're looking for in this thread.

Marven

I completely agree!

Keep your money in your bank account, and DON'T play progressions.

nolinks://vlsroulette.com/the-dark-side/progressions-why/

Your friend,
Marven

Werdna

QuoteThey're from a real session at Dublinbet, table 1

Thanks RJL

downloaded some numbers from weisbaden and am processing the results.

Werdna

WARRIOR

thanks jhm and marven appreciate that i just wanted to see where iboba was coming from i have seen to many good people lose with progression thats why i will keep trying to work on this bet is all fun for me and maybe if we find a good reliable bet we will all meet one day and take some money out of the casinos ,  and it keeps my mind working.all the best Tino

Ka2

Numbers to Letters... simple you only need 4 ABCD  RO RE BO BE ....

"These are the kind that jump all over the table or wheel. Look closely and of course you can see patterns of a kind too. Ie. abccbaabcabcdca ...etc. Same rules as above apply."


Werdna

Quote from: Ka2 on February 09, 2009, 05:27:42 AM
Numbers to Letters... simple you only need 4 ABCD  RO RE BO BE ....

"These are the kind that jump all over the table or wheel. Look closely and of course you can see patterns of a kind too. Ie. abccbaabcabcdca ...etc. Same rules as above apply."



Hi Ka2

yes he does state that but.....on his old page he states this...

"Try letter coding? You will see not only patterns but how "random results" are not as "random" as you think! Numerical results are too confusing. I found my bet this way. I also found a few simple "dummy" bets I don't win or lose on but are very "useful" for confusing others!"

This is how he found his bet.....

"I discovered something that should happen more often...a lot more often, but did not! It was because I have this habit of converting results into code that I spotted it. I don't think I was too excited at the time because long term results at roulette usually prove short term results to be false."

If we all go there then we should find it too....the more of us testing codes from live numbers reduces the odds of not finding it.

Perhaps an excel sheet that we can input the live numbers into it that tells us the next moves of r+b...o+e...h+l...Dozens 1,2,3...Columns 1,2,3....which numbers go to which numbers...which splits to which splits...corners to corners and totals the numbers of times they move to each other.

I have some numbers on the lines which I did last night, warning ...it's very colourful!!!

I'll attach it and hope that I get the attachment right as the last one I did not

Werdna

Werdna

New Ken

IF I WERE CHARLES HAMPSHIRE, i'd WANT to create doubt as to the veracity of my claims. For a good reason.



NEW KEN

redhot

Quote from: Werdna on February 09, 2009, 12:25:37 PM
Hi Ka2

yes he does state that but.....on his old page he states this...

"Try letter coding? You will see not only patterns but how "random results" are not as "random" as you think! Numerical results are too confusing. I found my bet this way. I also found a few simple "dummy" bets I don't win or lose on but are very "useful" for confusing others!"

This is how he found his bet.....

"I discovered something that should happen more often...a lot more often, but did not! It was because I have this habit of converting results into code that I spotted it. I don't think I was too excited at the time because long term results at roulette usually prove short term results to be false."

If we all go there then we should find it too....the more of us testing codes from live numbers reduces the odds of not finding it.

Perhaps an excel sheet that we can input the live numbers into it that tells us the next moves of r+b...o+e...h+l...Dozens 1,2,3...Columns 1,2,3....which numbers go to which numbers...which splits to which splits...corners to corners and totals the numbers of times they move to each other.

I have some numbers on the lines which I did last night, warning ...it's very colourful!!!

I'll attach it and hope that I get the attachment right as the last one I did not

Werdna

Werdna

Nice job werdna!! I like where your going with this

Werdna

Quote from: New Ken on February 09, 2009, 12:28:21 PM
IF I WERE CHARLES HAMPSHIRE, i'd WANT to create doubt as to the veracity of my claims. For a good reason.



NEW KEN


You mean, so that idiots don't get hold of it??

Werdna

Werdna

Thanks Redhot


If we are to believe that what CEH is saying is true (and I like to believe it is ::) ) then we have to find what he found. He is telling us to do what he did and we will find it....we just need some one who's good with excel or the likes and we can all test and compare.

Its a shame RX doesn't do that as it would be alot easier.....but then again he's after people that work for it, I guess working for it will make us understand the variables that happen.

Brainpower and a shovel according to CEH!

I wonder if the shovel is for that early grave?

Werdna

WARRIOR

Werdna  This is where im at you will never see number 25 example  then 37 spins then 25 then37 spins then 25  and 37 spins  may be in a million spins that pattern will happen.what does happen is that 25 will come up closer together ,then there wiil be a long gaps .i think that goes for any bet in roulette,on a 6 blocks it should hit3 times with in 5 spins then follow for 2   .spilt bet the cycle is , hit ratio 3 in 10 spins and follow 5 spins,dozens and colums must hit 3 time in row to follow2 times and then stop.street bets of 3 numbers should hit 3 with in 8 spins to follow 4 times.evon money  on a staight run are ok 5 or 6  to follow 1 time . as the odds in roulette plays diminish so do profits on staight run cycles. im testing this right now. all the best Tino. ps. all bets  are followed on any warmed up cycle hope this helps.

WARRIOR

ok here something else  conventional moves -  unconventional thinking-runs and changes- long and short series . 5 basic types of runs this is what im reserching short and long, one side or the other side, and erractic.when the results are running in clusters or bunches continue with them. when it chops stop or continue with them thats unconvetional thinking   when we think only straight runs ,thats convetional moves.so there you have it .thas what im looking at and if that does work im going to reverse all that and if that does work go to the crazy House.

WARRIOR

-