HOW TO FIND A CONSISTENT WINNING ROULETTE BET

[Werdna]

Cheers Tino

In your findings, have you found anything that doesn't happen that should within two hours of play.

CEH averaged two hours of play 8K earnings, his bet is based on that something that doesn't happen that should.....the opposite is wide open

I'm also wondering how many chips he is using each time.

Werdna

[New Ken]

You mean, so that idiots don't get hold of it??

Werdna

Not even close, Werdna.

But it'll do for now.

[WARRIOR]

werdna to answer your question something that should happen  but it does not  patterns should reapeat more often but they dont thats why he talks about that on page 3 thats the only thing at the moment   .

[JHM]

Ken,

How is testing going mate? Sorry I still haven't done more testing. I was busy with a new bet I found, which turned out to be nothing.

[New Ken]

Hi, JHM.
Haven't tested since (at +178, 700 sp). Philc got me distracted, if you know what I mean !

New Ken

[tastec]

What doesn't seem to happen as often as it should:-

There are 27 combinations of 3 dozens or 3 columns
I did a 500 spin test on columns and found that the results are not even eg
222 came 8 times
333 came 9 times
211 came 32 times
133 came 27 times
and all the others within the range 8 to 32

I imagine each 500 spins will throw up different results.
I am trying to figure out if this can be used to formulate a bet.

From reading CH's info I think the bet is just 1 or 2 chips on doz or columns, as he talks about only going down 2 units and also 10 pound returns 20 pounds etc

Graeme

[Werdna]

What doesn't seem to happen as often as it should:-

There are 27 combinations of 3 dozens or 3 columns
I did a 500 spin test on columns and found that the results are not even eg
222 came 8 times
333 came 9 times
211 came 32 times
133 came 27 times
and all the others within the range 8 to 32

I imagine each 500 spins will throw up different results.
I am trying to figure out if this can be used to formulate a bet.

From reading CH's info I think the bet is just 1 or 2 chips on doz or columns, as he talks about only going down 2 units and also 10 pound returns 20 pounds etc

Graeme

Hi tastec and welcome to the forum.

I read it as two 20 bet units which would put a whole new perspective on it

"They have 20 bets of the same amount to use each session. In most sessions we never use more than 2 units from our bank before being in profit.
Ie. If we use a playing bank of £10.000 for a session we have 20 bet units of £500. For each bet."

How does it read to others?

Werdna

[Werdna]

This bit

"May I explain by way of example? Our bet has shown on occasions to lose 6 in a row. So we need to multiply our session bank  3x6 = 18 (we round it up to 20)"

to me says he's betting 3 chips


Werdna

[Werdna]

To me that is £500 per spin, so that could be 5 bets of £100 or 4 bets of £125 or 2 bets of £250. Or he could have just rounded the figures to give an example. If it was 5 bets it could be 1 column, 1 dozen, 1 colour, odd or even, high or low.   or 5 streets  or something completely different.
 

Hi philc

if you go back through the formula for working out how much to bet ie; we round it up to 20 from 18 divided by 6 = 3

if you do that with the 500 it = 75 per chip =225

Werdna

[Werdna]

So we need to multiply our session bank  3....(chips)?.....x6

Werdna

[Werdna]

"There is a "Reason" why I have not published all the "differentials" about the roulette wheels and layouts. This is because they are "Conventional" and only serve to confuse. Do not follow this route, look for the "Opposite" in all you find!  There is "Good Reason" to do so."

from his old web page

if he was winning up £19000 in one two hour session he would of had to of been placing inside bets probably corner bets is my guess.

If you do the opposite corner bets that come after a certain sequence with £75 chips it could be done.

If you were outside betting I don't think it could be achieved in two hours.

Werdna

[Werdna]

"We found it by looking at the "Game" not the "Odds", and used a great deal of "lateral thinking" in the research. I was not the greatest of thinkers and found mine by default"

"Lateral thinking" means thinking outside of the box and "Lateral" also means side to side

My thoughts up until now have been that it's an outside bet or bets...but...there are 36 boxes inside and corner or split betting would still be outside of the 36 boxes.

Werdna

[ikarianman]

dude!sometihng about runs and chances.i figure out that from the first 10-15 spins things start to show off.by this i mean that you know if distribution of hits is going to be close to equal inside the wheel,or its going to hit 2,3 or 4 sectors more.and most times this happens!either we have hot aereas in the wheel or we have a normal distribution so in both cases we can take advantage.when hot aereas, we can bet them
when more normal hitting comes we can bet sleeping aereas.i play like this in rouleete extreme and the results are by now
1561 spins 1153 units,starting from 100 units,flat betting,11 or 12 units bet each time (inside 1 unit straight bets-3 tries if lose)
i hope it goes ok

[Werdna]

dude!sometihng about runs and chances.i figure out that from the first 10-15 spins things start to show off.by this i mean that you know if distribution of hits is going to be close to equal inside the wheel,or its going to hit 2,3 or 4 sectors more.and most times this happens!either we have hot aereas in the wheel or we have a normal distribution so in both cases we can take advantage.when hot aereas, we can bet them
when more normal hitting comes we can bet sleeping aereas.i play like this in rouleete extreme and the results are by now
1561 spins 1153 units,starting from 100 units,flat betting,11 or 12 units bet each time (inside 1 unit straight bets-3 tries if lose)
i hope it goes ok

Hi Ikarianman

is that with downloaded live spins?

Werdna

[sebix]

Hi everyone!

I am new on this forum, but I have to admit that I am reading your topic about Charles Hampshire and his secret bet for almost one month now. I felt it is time for me to actively join you guys in your research, because I have a couple of ideas.

First of all, I think that the present discussions in this thread are going in the wrong direction. I think that the key to this bet is, as Charles says, "lateral thinking". Through 1000+ post, everything you tried was related to "straight" thinking, a very conventional type of thinking, the (cause)->(effect) thinking. So, let us focus on the "lateral" thinking. I think that by "lateral" thinking, Charles meant that we should think of roulette in a totally new way. My advice to you is that we should think about roulette with our eyes closed, very relaxed, trying to use some unconscious information about this game. The greatest inventors (e.g. Thomas Edison) used some kind of meditation, some kind of escape from the real, tangible world.

Another very important thing that it was not discussed here is the concept of RANDOMNESS. We must not forget that roulette is RANDOM, and as Charles states, it is in our favor. We should try to understand better this thing. For me, randomness means the fact that a thing is unpredictable (red/black even/odd low/high). But I am sure that this unpredictability is only for the "straight" thinking. Using the "lateral" thinking, this unpredictability will be transformed into predictability. I think people are wrong when trying to predict future numbers based on previous numbers using a (cause)->(effect) algorithm, because randomness is the very opposite of this relation ((same cause)->(different effect)). Another particular feature of randomness that I observed is the fact that in a lot of cases surprises people (after a 0, maybe a lot of us will not expect another 0, but when the wheal stops, we can see the number is 0 again). Surprising people means for the casino guaranteed winnings (because everyone knows that the casino earns much more that the theoretical 2.7% house edge). So we must dive into the world of randomness and learn how to use it for our benefit.

When applying "lateral" thinking and proper knowledge of the randomness to the roulette layout (that is very unbalanced and we can take advantage of this), I think that the "secret" bet will show itself to us.

sebix 

   

[sebix]

-