Exploiting the unusual by means of a regular trend

[Arteinvivo]

a Here is a new idea to exploit a regular pattern which occurs frequently
between "Runs Of Length 1" versus "Runs Of Length > 1".

A run of length x is always observed after the fact. For example, playing Red/Black, we will observe a run of length x only when the run ends, i.e., one spin later.

R,B,B,B,R,... We have one run of length 1, one run of length 3 and one we don't know yet as we do not see its completion.

Here is my suggestion on how to track RUNS during the course of a session. Keep a count which will increase +1 when you observe a run of length > 1 and decrease -1 when you observe a run of length 1. That's it, as simple as that. We are not interested to note how long is a run, we just want to count how many runs last 1 spin versus runs which last more than 1 spin.

Let's look at the evolution of this count for a given day (Wiesbaden table 2 - February 14, 2008) :
-1, 0, 1, 2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -2, -1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -4, -5, -4, -5, -6, -5, -6, -7, -6, -5, -6, -7, -6, -7, -6, -5, -6, -7, -6, -7, -6, -7, -6, -5, -6, -7, -8, -7, -8, -7, -6, -7, -8, -9, -10, -9, -10, -9, -8, -7, -6, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9, -10, -9, -10, -11, -10, -11, -10, -9, -10, -9, -10

By simply looking at the evolution of the count, we can deduct there have been more runs of length 1 than runs of length > 1.

Let's look at it by converting the count into a graphic representation...

Graph representing Runs Of Length 1 versus Runs Of Length > 1



What stands out in this graph are the many periods of stability we can observe. I was quite astounded to note that most days of Wiesbaden or Hamburg have plenty of them. So much indeed that it prompted me to test an idea using a simple Alembert progression and which works very smoothly.

I'll get back to the method later on. Meanwhile try to see by yourself by looking at the graph or the count above how you could come up with a tactic to exploit these "Runs Of Length 1" versus "Runs Of Length > 1".

You'll be agreeably surprised.

More to come...

[admin]

how you could come up with a tactic to exploit these "Runs Of Length 1" versus "Runs Of Length > 1".

The periods of "tranquility" / balance-like alternate with the volatile spikes... So one must wait for one of those those spikes and have the betting signal as the start of the balance-like time. Risk a few "test units" and if hit, then go full blown and enjoy the concentration of hits, till a new volatile spike.

Basic dispersion-surfing technique should be done to try to stretch the bank and avoid the concatenations of bad times.

[Arteinvivo]

Thanks VLS for your feedback.

Here is a run i did on 10000 spins from Hamburg :



When it climbs, it climbs  

[Arteinvivo]

When it goes up it is a run of length > 1, when it goes down it is a run of length = 1

[Arteinvivo]

Here is my cunning plan to take advantage of "Runs Of Length 1" versus "Runs Of Length > 1".

(This idea can be applied to the game of Baccarat or Roulette by selecting an even chance like Red/Black.)

As mentionned in my first comment, it's easy to track the many RUNS during the course of a session. We just need to keep a count which will increase +1 when we observe a run of length > 1 and decrease -1 when we observe a run of length 1. We are not interested to note how long is a run, we just want to count how many runs last 1 spin versus runs which last more than 1 spin.

THE SYSTEM
As you update the count of RUNS you'll notice that some values of this running count keep repeating more than others. Your objective will be to target those values which repeat the most. This can't be easier than this. Look at the following graph where the evolution of the count is shown (Wiesbaden, February 21, 2008 Table 2).

When a run of length > 1 is observed, the curve goes up /. When a run of length 1 is observed, the curve goes down \. I have used a red rectangle to stress some periods of play where the same count value kept repeating over and over.



This recurring passage of the "running count" in the same spot is a constant you can observe in the vast majority of "data streams". The probability to make at least one unit/day with this system using a flat bet amount is in my opinion very high.

Here are some more examples :

[Joker]

Hello there..

Man you must put lots of effort for this.. and i am glat that you are working hard to even chance bet...

well, I was thinking.. maybe you can wait  seven dots in row  in same place... then you can wait till -1 or 1 then bet

flat bet...

well, can you test this system?

wait till 5 or more streak BBBBBBB R <<< break then next one bet on B again..
if we lose we wait another chance like this.. and we have 7 progressive


we must find out the way to win 4-5 units per visit... with 7 progressive maximum.....

what do you think?

[Arteinvivo]

If it is not regularity i wonder what it is

[Joker]

So... how would we bet this ?

[Arteinvivo]

The idea is to target the dominant horizontal lines. You can use different strategies.

[kawa4711]

Hi, Arte, thank you for sharing all your interesting ideas , most of them give me another view of the "theme Roulette" , some are a little bit difficult for me to understand, but after reading your ideas more than one time I understand.
But all your ideas are GREAT.

By trying to play your idea: "Exploiting the unusual by means of a regular trend"
I made some tests with this idea:

Beginning a play it starts at 0.

After a serie plus 1, after a single coup - 1 .
Most of the time it begins to drift till - 7,8 or more, the same with + like plus 7, 8 or more.
Playing on all 3 even chances there must be a way to exploit this.
The question is :
When is the best time to begin :
When I begin to play at -1 single coups and it becomes zigzaging like: -1, 0, +1,0,-1,0,-1,-2,-1,0, you will loose if you change at +1 to playing the series.

The important question for me is: Where is the best entrypoint to play series or singlecoups.

If you begin at -1 and you decide to play consequently single coups and after +1 you play again single coups and the trend goes to e.g. -3,-4 or higher in the minus (more single coups) you are a winner, but if the trend changes you are in the loosing road.

Best regards

kawa4711

[Arteinvivo]

Where is the best entrypoint to play series or singlecoups

As woul say VIC, when there is concentration of both small streaks and chop's.

[Arteinvivo]

-