Questions about the game of Baccarat

[Arteinvivo]

Still having fun testing this idea..getting some slow and nice results.
Just a question..what does the long term say of banker outcome of 3 or more in a streak if you compare to player.
Just if it is a good idea to bet B after BB? rubbish? prob 

Worm,

Here is a more fascinating idea.

We know bank should hit more often than player but because of the commission we have to pay when Bank hits then it kinds of compensate for or counterbalance the apparent advantage Bank has over Player. But a thing is sure Bank will hit more often than player.
[colorsb]
Try this, on each hand bet on Bank, always. This bet selection is the easiest of all. You don't need to think, just bet on bank on every turn.

You'll use a very simple money management. You will use the old timer Alembert progression when you lose one time after a single B or a run of B like this:

B +1
P -1
B +2 increased bet won
B +1
B +1
P -1
B +2 increased bet won
P -1
P -2 increased bet lost, next time bet 3 instead of 2
P -1
P -1
B +1
P -1
B +3 increased bet Won, next time bet 3-1 = 2
P -1
B +2 increased bet won
etc.

See ?

The first lost after a single B or any run on the B side you increase your bet. If this increased bet is lost then next time you bet the same amount +1. You use the Alembert progression on this one shot after a single or a run on the B side.
[/colorsb]
Here are some results:

[Arteinvivo]

This is the final analysis of 91 shoes provided by a good friend of mine Johno from GG:
A simple Alembert suffices to beat Johno's 91 real shoes. Highest bet ever 10 units

The reason why it works so well is because it uses the optimal mixture of MM and BS. Always betting on B is the optimal way to bet and the Alembert applied when losing once after a single or a run is also the optimal time to increase our wagers.

This prove one thing, designing a system to stay above ground zero is not that tough if you know what you are doing. 

[Worm]

Wow nice result i have to admit . Thanks for your time and effort posting this.

Have a nice day and take care 

/Worm

[Arteinvivo]

<This is the final analysis of 91 shoes provided by a good friend of mine Johno from GG:>

Is that the same one who is intellectually inpaired and plays often?

You've got some neck arte, I'll give you that.

No, the one i know does not come in pair, he is complete in himself 

[Worm]

Hmm I like the only bet when single P even better.... although it simular..
Any advice on where to find real shoe results btw?

[dennisbelle]

Arte,
   In your second example above about half way down you bet 8 units and won then at the next opportunity you bet 7 units and won then at the next opportunity you dropped your bet to 2 units rather than 6 units?  Would you explain why you reduced your bet to 2 units rather than bet 6 units?

[smiley=3D-Smil/28_1_14.gif]

[Worm]

Just gamblers intelligens i think, after being in the - and then get back up u need to downsize your bet again

[Arteinvivo]

Arte,
   In your second example above about half way down you bet 8 units and won then at the next opportunity you bet 7 units and won then at the next opportunity you dropped your bet to 2 units rather than 6 units?  Would you explain why you reduced your bet to 2 units rather than bet 6 units?

[smiley=3D-Smil/28_1_14.gif]

Each time i win a bet which is greater than 2 i look at my running balance and if it is > 0 then i reset my bet to 2 to avoid risking money for nothing since i am positive at that point. It's not optimal but it's less risky. Again, this is just a possibility not an end in itself.

[Arteinvivo]

-