I think I have come up with a winning method by accident.

[easy2win]

I have made an excelprogram for the dozens.
Betting system 1-3-9-27-54-etc.
Sample 150 spins.

You can download theprogram for free:nolinks://nolinks.mijnbestand.nl/Bestand-CAS8KK6XMBHB.xlsx

Please give your remarks

I !! Thanks for your work but I don't understand wich file is the excel we must use... Could you help me please?

[schoenpoetser]

I don`t understand your question. I have proved the link and I became the program. There is a button to activate the program.
It is a study for the dozens. I programmed the system for the SSB-method. A sample of 150 spins gives nearly a profit + or - 90 units. Therefor is a mathematical explanation.

[Robeenhuut]

I have made an excelprogram for the dozens.
Betting system 1-3-9-27-54-etc.
Sample 150 spins.

You can download theprogram for free:nolinks://nolinks.mijnbestand.nl/Bestand-CAS8KK6XMBHB.xlsx

Please give your remarks

1,3,9,27 progression is a recipe for disaster.  You can use when you see dozen sleep for 20+ spins maybe. Otherwise to much risk.

Regards

[marvin]

1,3,9,27 progression is a recipe for disaster.  You can use when you see dozen sleep for 20+ spins maybe. Otherwise to much risk.

Regards

i agree to this ... and i learned ot the hard way

[schoenpoetser]

Robeenhuut: You didnot study the program. A random sequence of 4 dozens will fall in average once in 81 spins,After every hit you start with a new random sequence.The chance you have a no-hit is once in 81 spins .

[Amazin]

I think I might have something to contribute here

@bikemotorman

no offence mate, I personally don't see any thing special in your system. You're not gaining any advantage by playing it your way.

nolinks://nolinks.rouletteforum.net/cgi-bin/forum/Blah.pl?m-1203189345/s-new/#num340

Another double dozen system and the OP (Simon) claims that he made £18,000 playing that system for a year simply by alternating and always have a bet in the middle dozen. He mentioned that he went to the seventh progression twice.

I have a sample of 10,000 spins and I asked my flatmate to run some tests playing it the way Simon plays. It turns out that 7 progression happened 4 times, two 8 progressions and a single 9 progression. So if you can go up to 7 progression, then you can always stay in profit.

I recently got to know a guy from smartlive. We exchanged our e-mails and he told me about his double dozen system which was quite interesting. He also told me he made lot of money from roulette using his system and bought a Landrover because of it.

Basically:

Only bet the last 2 dozen appeared, flat betting only. No progression. You might be thinking what??? Here is part two:

After 5 losses, he would put 10 units on each dozen and use the 1-3-9-27 progression until he wins, then just go back to flat betting again.

Anyone want to testout?   

[mcmonaco]

Haven't you seen 3,2,1 alternating 9 times in a row,or 1,2,3----1,3,2-----3,1,2-----2,1,3-----2,3,1---
well if you haven't I can assure you it happens more then you would imagine it could.I have seen it 13 times once,as thought as you now,but after testing it throughouly it just fails on long terms....maybe
on night play basis it could work...but untill when.

[jarabo002]

I think I might have something to contribute here

@bikemotorman

no offence mate, I personally don't see any thing special in your system. You're not gaining any advantage by playing it your way.

nolinks://nolinks.rouletteforum.net/cgi-bin/forum/Blah.pl?m-1203189345/s-new/#num340

Another double dozen system and the OP (Simon) claims that he made £18,000 playing that system for a year simply by alternating and always have a bet in the middle dozen. He mentioned that he went to the seventh progression twice.

I have a sample of 10,000 spins and I asked my flatmate to run some tests playing it the way Simon plays. It turns out that 7 progression happened 4 times, two 8 progressions and a single 9 progression. So if you can go up to 7 progression, then you can always stay in profit.

I recently got to know a guy from smartlive. We exchanged our e-mails and he told me about his double dozen system which was quite interesting. He also told me he made lot of money from roulette using his system and bought a Landrover because of it.

Basically:

Only bet the last 2 dozen appeared, flat betting only. No progression. You might be thinking what??? Here is part two:

After 5 losses, he would put 10 units on each dozen and use the 1-3-9-27 progression until he wins, then just go back to flat betting again.

Anyone want to testout?

Do you play a progression afte 5 CONSECUTIVE losses?

Must be the progression 10-30-90-270 units instead 1-3-9-27?

[jarabo002]

I have made an excelprogram for the dozens.
Betting system 1-3-9-27-54-etc.
Sample 150 spins.

You can download theprogram for free:nolinks://nolinks.mijnbestand.nl/Bestand-CAS8KK6XMBHB.xlsx

Please give your remarks

Does this program works in Excel 2007?

Thanks

[marivo]

There is a button to activate the program.

Where?

[TwoCatSam]

Gents

This is a bastardization of the old "Steve Morgan System" I purchased years ago for $35.  I did a test of Steve's idea through all--and I do mean ALL- 15,000 spins of the Zuma 00 roulette tester.  It did amazingly well against such odds.  I think it would have at least broken even against the 0 wheel.

Anyway, I've spent a year trying to understand Lanky's six point divisor for two dozens and finally got it.  Yes, I'm slow!  But I got it.

I am currently playing this system with the divisor at Dublin.  I believe this is as close to a winning method as I've ever seen.  It does require a large bankroll ($5/$1,000), but as Lanky once said--it never looses.  Yeah, it pokes around for twenty spins trying to get back to even, but it has always gotten there.

Caveat:  I know I won't live long enough (you won't either) to test it, but it seems mathematically viable.

As long as I'm sitting at Dublin playing my guitar, I might as well test that Uly thing and see if there is some validity to it also.

Speak people!  I'd even like Number6 to come along and tell me how I'm wasting my time!

Samster

[TwoCatSam]

For the last time, then I'll shut up............

This certainly seems to be a winning idea when coupled with Lanky's divisor.  I would surely play for real on Dublin if I could.

The most bets the divisor has taken to return to zero is 20.

The flip-flop on the dozens/columns does two things:  If you have a sleeping dozen, it will pass it by.  If you have a hot dozen, it will always hit it.  We're basing that statement on three tries.  1 3 9 progression.  Lose?  Use the divisor to return to zero and carry on.

The thing about the divisor is this:  If the wheel is throwing dozens like it should, you win.  If it's throwing in your direction, you win quicker.  If it's throwing in the wrong direction, the divisor will let you sweat it out and wait for the change.

I'm done.

Sam

[ReDsQuaD]

I think Steve Morgan died last year. He has not replied to 3 of my emails now. The last email I sent was around 2 months ago and the last reply was march last year. He was a really nice man who coached me he's way of playing.

You wait for a dozen or column to repeat a pattern. Ie Dozen1Dozen1Dozen2Dozen2  Dozen1Dozen1Dozen2Dozen2
You bet against that pattern forming again, so I would then bet on dozens 2 and 3.

Regrettably though I found out the hard way in gala casino that it was flawed.

I won't go into it but after deep research, I realised the truth about roulette.

[mcmonaco]

--He didn't but his method did.

[mcmonaco]

--He didn't but his method did.

[mcmonaco]

-