Finding a CONSISTENT Losing Roulette Bet

[Lohnro]

Who can show the WORST bet selection method possible? Is it possible to show a method that performs worse than the -2.7%?

[Compa]

Thats very easy. Just play Zero and figures together consequently without progression!
The BR will be gone in no time..lol


Cheers
/Compa

[TwoCatSam]

/Compa

What is this:  "Zero and figures together"?  I understand Zero but not "Zero and figures together".

Sam

[MATTJONO]

Great question Lohnro,
the first thought that came into my head was.

all our bankroll on 1 number 1spin bet.

but consistantly would this still be a -2.7% house adge. i guess so. 

mattjono

[Compa]

/Compa

What is this:  "Zero and figures together"?  I understand Zero but not "Zero and figures together".

Sam

The figures are you know like 1.10.19.28/2.11.20.29.. and so on.
So just pick any Figure and play that and the Zero. I gurantee you have a Major losing bet..LOL

[Lohnro]

If we cannot find a bet the losses more than expected, how can we find a bet that wins more than expected?

[Lohnro]

Lohnro, looks like someones calling you an idiot.
Quote from page 19 win3million.com

I HAVE TOLD YOU THAT FORUMS HAVE "NUTTERS" AND NOW ON VLS ONE OF THE  SENIOR MODERATORS  HAS STARTED A "THREAD....ASKING FOR "A NON-CONSISTENT LOSING BET" ?


THINK ABOUT IT....MORE PROOF! ...AND THE IDIOTS ARE ACTUALLY VERY "INTERESTED IN THIS ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTION. ?
IT WOULD BE FUNNY.....BUT IT IS TRUE!!!!  NO WONDER THEY NEED NEW IDIOTS TO JOIN......ALL THOSE WHO HAVE BRAINS LEAVE QUICK.
****************************
But I know you meant A CONSISTENT LOSING BET.

LOL...........water off a duck's back here.........some people take things way too seriously. Yes, I do mean a CONSISTENT LOSING BET!

[Lohnro]

Topic Heading modified.

[Natural9]

Well if you could find a consistant losingbet you bet opposite to find consistant winning bet goes without saying actually but we win or lose according to the casino edge on whatever game  we are playing unless you playing the LW and LW is al to  do with timing

Regards Rodney

[lucky_strike]

Now finding an consistent losing bet has nothing to do with it because there just don't exist as an static bet selection that will overcome any thing other then it will jump up and down.

I believe that if some one want to gain any kind of edge then there is VB and Bias.
Not so sure about DS do because the element of good conditions and predict is to close to your average static bet selection.

Well I more into that it exist and positive edge.
Like Laurance Scott says it ain't so hard to get an positive edge, 10% using light VB with DS, but it will still hurt you when fluctuation kicks in with an low edge like that.

Well that is public information.
Well some famous gamblers do claim having an edge above 15% and doing well with an loss ratio of 25%.

LS

[VLSroulette]

Lohnro, physically speaking, there ARE consistent negative/losing bets.

I.e. negative bias numbers. Those which donate hit rate to the positive biased ones which hit above their rate.

I.e. a fret has physical trais which makes ball bounce a bit harder and makes the ball land at neighbours.

Also, there are ways to develop "Negative Visual Ballistic" by giving you a deeper NEGATIVE edge aiming at the worst spot for ball hitting the least hit point in ball scatter distribution, the least hitting diamond, etc. aiming at the very worst conditions and on those wheels with "proper conditions" you will succeed giving you a larger negative edge.

But who would like to put money on negative bias / negatve ballistic methods?

I know this is just for the "sake" of it, don't worry, I know nobody will

[Natural9]

I found a tilted wheel in Crown casino Melbourne a few years back i went to bed come back the next day the casino had fixed it up    guess all the casino needs  is a level

[Boo_Ray]

Thats very easy. Just play Zero and figures together consequently without progression!
The BR will be gone in no time..lol


Cheers
/Compa

So playing against this figures should give you edge?

[Jakkalsdraai]

Compa's idea of figures might not be so bad idea.

If a number is spun play that numbers figure. Next number play that number's figure and so forth. Might just turn out to be a consistant looser lol.

Example: 27 (Now play 9,18,27,36)
             13 (Play 4,13,22,31)
             17 (Play 8,17,26,35)
             3  (Play 3,12,21,30)
             19 (Play 1,10,19,28)
             15 (Play 6,15,24,33)
             25 (Play 7,16,25,34)

So b2b would be bad I guess.

Worth testing though. Sure as hell didn't work out as a winner lol.

Cheers
Jakk

[lucky_strike]

How about divide something and when one thing is left and all the others has hit with in expectation and one left that has not hit with in expectation then you play this one.
This way you can win 20 to 50 bets in a row flat betting if it goes for sleep a very long time or if they close come back the next day and continue.

You can name it the very next thing is for this one to hit but does it?

LS

[lucky_strike]

-