simple question

[ikarianman]

lets say you cut the wheel in the middle,and start betting on a statical 180 degrees pie of you desire,is it the same as betting on an even chance(red black etc,,)

i mean.. we know that red for example (that is half the wheel but not continous), can repeat for 20 times in a bad run.
theoritically since a 180 degrees pie is half the wheel,it could not be hitted for 20 lets say times.
but in reality ,is this so often event as red black?

[winkel]

lets say you cut the wheel in the middle,and start betting on a statical 180 degrees pie of you desire,is it the same as betting on an even chance(red black etc,,)

simply: YES

br
winkel

[toey]

I've asked this very same question before on another forum, and only received a handful of intelligent responses.

My gut theory is that covering a sector continuously is a tad more helpful than covering the same amount spread throughout. Although it is a very simple question, I'm afraid it does not equate to a simple answer.

[Yous]

Well i personally think it is NOT the same as betting on red and black.  If you look at the wheel itself, 1 pocket after the other changes colour.  SO half of the wheel consists of may be 9 red and 9 back, or 9 blacks, 8 red, 1 green.  So i mean if you look it that way, and say you can predict that ball is going to land in the first half of the wheel, but that is still a multi coloured, equally even or odd, half.  I personally think that betting on 1 half of the wheel is very powerful.  But actual number in the half.  Say if your not amazing at visual ballistic, and you can predict which 5 numbers the ball will land  on, but if you predict which half, it gives you a hit rate of 1 in 18/19.  That is still very very powerful considering the odds are 1 in 35.  That is better then betting then buying any of the computers or systems becasuse you can see their hit rate is usually about 1 in 20 - 25.  i hope my answer helped.

[Yous]

-