Inside Number System - Wins within ten spins, Not betting every spin

[rjeaton1]

This system is so good, I might go ahead and market it on Ebay.   

Also, if you check out the legal disclaimer at nolinks.fast-e-downloads.com (please nobody buy a subscription to this site, if you would like access to it PM me and I'll just give you a login for free) you'll see a lot of legal jargon.  Legal jargon written for me by my lawyer.  As an established webmaster I must have a lawyer to prevent legal action being taken against me.

Now, once you've read that and you can see that I do take the time for little things, and I do not just rush into them, and you still think I would share a system of mine (that's original, not modified by somebody else) and not take the time to make sure I had it documented as being mine then go ahead and sell it.  I have a legal recourse.

[rjeaton1]

Wow, you would openly admit that you would steal someone else's system, that they spent many hours,days,months etc perfecting to make a profit?  It is not yours to sell.  RJ intended it for personal use for the members of this forum and unless HE decides to do otherwise that is how it should stay IMO.

Back to the overall topic, haven't lost yet with this.  RJ, I notice you start out with a 5000 unit BR, but that's a little steep for me.  What do you recommend as a minimum starting BR?

Thanks Celiza, I appreciate you backing me up!  The 5000 unit BR is just a number that populates on it's own when I open RXtreme.  It's not the BR that I necessarily recommend.  I would say that having a BR of four or five hundred units would be absolutely safe (as safe as it can be anyway...unless we discover this is in fact the HG...haha) and a BR of two or three hundred to be able to play and hope that a loss doesn't come until you get to four or five hundred units.  Sorry I can't be more precise but seeing as I haven't lost yet, it's difficult for me to say.

This is kind of one of the questions I would like to see some more help from the others on answering (by them testing the system).  That's why I posted it, for perfecting or just making it better or even just finding out the nitty gritty details like starting BR.

As I said before, if I get a ton of positive response to this system then I will have this coded for RXtreme as well to really find out the highs and the lows of it.

Can't wait to hear some more from you testers!  Thanks again to everybody for reading this thread and giving your feedback thus far!

[celiza427]

I used a BR of 200 and did have a little scare, I got to where I had to put 5 chips per # but then I won and recouped all my losses, yay.  But still probably 300 minimum would be fairly safe.  200 would still be do-able, but there you'd have to hope for some luck like you said and if you win your first several sessions you'll be up to a 300 BR anyway.  I've yet to go past 31 spins to get a win as well, but I'll keep testing.

[rjeaton1]

I used a BR of 200 and did have a little scare, I got to where I had to put 5 chips per # but then I won and recouped all my losses, yay.  But still probably 300 minimum would be fairly safe.  200 would still be do-able, but there you'd have to hope for some luck like you said and if you win your first several sessions you'll be up to a 300 BR anyway.  I've yet to go past 31 spins to get a win as well, but I'll keep testing.

Excellent, thanks for the feedback Celiza!  I hope everyone else's results are holding up as well as yours (if not there is always room for improvement)

[Nathan Detroit]

This  hot vegas nite is an exposed scammer:

nolinks://nolinks.gamblersglen.com/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&topic=409&forum=Gambling_Systems_For_Sale

The  cat with his BIB:

nolinks://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-sf2p/v248/113/8/1337460047/


Nathan Detroit Posted: 29-Mar-09 13:00    Edit

     
In reference to Jockstrap, THE AMATEUR


"When ignorance reaches $40 a barrel,
I want the drilling rights to his head."


The curse of Dr. Mabuse , The Gambler : TSI-NAN-FU




Nathan Detroit

[rjeaton1]

Guys, chill out.  It was only a joke that I thought you guys would find to be rediculously funny.   I was only complementing rjeaton1 on his excellent system.   You guys play around with me so I am doing the same and you guys could not take it.   If I really was going to steal someones work and market it, I certainly would not be stupid enough to broadcast it in the author's thread.   But, I know what it is like to have my system stolen.   Just look at what pooper scoopers did to me.

Glad to hear that Vegas!  I'm also happy to hear that you like the system and you've had good results!  Anybody else testing?  If so, post some spins and win/loss details so we can get this system moving towards the HG...haha.

[celiza427]

A little wink at the end of your sentence would've been more helpful to realize it was a joke lol

Just a joke, no offense taken then (on my part anyway ;P)

[Nathan Detroit]

My best wishes  to all  of  you nice  posters for falling  prey to this  LOW LIFE of a SCAMMER*": hot vegas nights*".


Good Bye.

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

P.S.How  naive  can one  get.

[rjeaton1]

My best wishes  to all  of  you nice  posters for falling  prey to this  LOW LIFE of a SCAMMER*": hot vegas nights*".


Good Bye.

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

P.S.How  naive  can one  get.

It's not that I'm falling prey to him Nathan, I'm trying to do two things by responding the way that I have:

A: Continuing to stay a member of this forum and adding what I perceive to be as valuable content  (because the alternative is to leave this forum as a member and not return or add any content for fear of it being stolen...then he has won)

B: Stay on the topic at hand which is this system, and bettering it, and finding out it's weaknesses (because the alternative here is to spend two or three pages bashing him, which leaves me where?...right where I left off, just two pages of peoples valuable opinions being wasted on the scammer and his post instead of their resources being directed at the real problem - the system.

I sincerely appreciate your level of disgust with him and what he has said, as you too are trying to keep this forum a valuable resource to everybody that deserves it.  However, let's just give him the benefit of the doubt, not discuss him, and just discuss the topic at hand.  He'll either steal the system, try to sell it, and get what he deserves...or he really was just kidding and he too might end up being a valuable resource.  Let's all let it go either which way he wants it too, but in the meantime let's find that HG...who knows, maybe this is it (haha) if not how can we make it better guys?

[petquesha]

My compliments, I already play a system similar to this for 5/6 years now.
I alway said that law off third is the key to winning.
I use a graphick to tell me when to start betting,and it is based on 'non' unique nrs to come (repeaters).

Well done ,but never forget that there are cycles off 37 spins with only 5/6 repeaters ,they can be dangerous.
I do progrees my bets when lose,because the repeater will come 100 % if start betting at the right time.

Lets keep this to ourselves guys, i wouldnt want to live without this income that roulette gives me and my family,

good luck,

regards,
Petquesha   

[RPro75]

This is by far the most logical and successful system that I have ever played with or seen posted on any forum.  I have always believed in The Law of the Third and have tried to model many of my systems around it as well.  I do believe that a system that can be designed with TLOTT and sector prediction as its base will ultimately become the most successful system ever.  This system has all of the dynamics a great system should have.  It has logic, ease of use, a good win ratio, and is based on a scientific fact.  Many people say that prior spins have no bearing in roulette, but that is not true.  Also, many people believe that there is no event that can be properly be predicted in roulette.  Again, untrue.  On the average, 20-26 unique numbers will appear in 38 spins.  You can be sure, at least 98% of the time, this event WILL happen in roulette. There must be others.  Winkel has pointed out and proven another one and that is at some point, the amount of numbers appeared and not appeared must change or cross from 19/18 to 18/19 and so forth.  RJ, I commend you for sharing this system.  I am much like you in that I share any systems or discoveries I might make unselfishly and for the benefit of others.  We must remember one thing, and that is there are people who would exploit people like us and steal from us (Hot Vegas Nights, etc.)  if they could make a quick buck.  HVN says that he was joking and I pray that is true.  It would be a shame to lose a brilliant member like RJ because he got upset and discouraged and decided not to share anymore.  He has done us all a great service by sharing this with us.  I have already won some money from his information and willingness to share.  His efforts are more than commendable, and to make a video also, awesome!  In closing, remember that roulette is only a game, and although there is a mathematical house edge built in, do not let that discourage you.  As it is just a game and cannot think for itself, we as humans CAN BEAT IT.  We just need to keep brainstorming and trying.  The answer will come.  It may just be right here in this thread!

[rjeaton1]

Simon  everything you said I absolutely agree with .

Rpro  Thanks for the serious compliment on the system, I sincerly appreciate you taking the time to try it out, and then coming back and telling us your results.  That's great, and it's what we need to further improve this system (if we need to...haha)

Simon, you said "6)  All I'm sure of for now is that we find any cycle of 20 spins with 3 or less repeaters, and then upon the next repeater we start betting all the numbers we are tracking which have not repeated, is that correct??"  Which is what I originally posted, that is exactly the sytem.  However, in the video I made a small modification and have been playing this way since:

Find any cycle of 20 spins with 3 or less repeaters, and then upon the next repeater we start betting all the numbers we have tracked thus far...singles, doubles, triples...all of them.  The reason for this is because I have gone past spin 31 a couple more times since my post about "only once in 650 spins" not because of a perfect pattern of "unique, double, unique, double, etc." but because of this "unique, double, triple, unique, double, triple".  With this modification I haven't lost...at all...yet, haha.

Also, one step you forgot:

If you have bet 3 times or less by the time you get to spin 31 you follow it the system out to spin 37.

Thanks again everybody, let's get some more test results from you guys!

[atlantis]

hot vegas night wrote:

Guys, chill out.  It was only a joke that I thought you guys would find to be rediculously funny.   I was only complementing rjeaton1 on his excellent system.   You guys play around with me so I am doing the same and you guys could not take it.   If I really was going to steal someones work and market it, I certainly would not be stupid enough to broadcast it in the author's thread.   But, I know what it is like to have my system stolen.   Just look at what pooper scoopers did to me.

hot vegas nite is an exposed scammer:

nolinks://nolinks.gamblersglen.com/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&topic=409&forum=Gambling_Systems_For_Sale

He has just started selling a new system over at GG for online roulette @ $49.99

I do not know whether he has packaged up this system or not.
Best keep an eye on this scamming cat.

Regards,
Atlantis.

[Nherisson]

@rjeaton: Thank you very much to share your system!! I hope you will find success with it!

Sorry, my english is quite bad, so sometimes I don't understand some rules of your system.  Is there anyone who can summarize me this system with the modification of rjeaton, because I really want to test this system.

Thank you 

[celiza427]

Nherisson,

I strongly suggest getting RouletteXtreme as it makes the tracking really easy.  You can d/l a trial for free and you'll have 25 uses before you have to buy.  Also, watching the video that RJ posted helped me very much.  RPro might be able to help you with tracking using another method if you do not want to d/l RX.

[celiza427]

-