Get answers to your questions about randomness.

[gizmotron]

Thanks for the reply.

If I hear you well,  your studying of randomness has more to do with art than science.  Is that right?

Insider

I know many artists of many different forms of expertise. Some have achieved what they have from perseverance and practice, always pushing themselves. You might call them craftsman of a trade. Some of them have studied the techniques of others before stepping up and attempting to be themselves in an original expression. Some have become the definition of the technique.

I have an acquired skill. I deliberately wait for my chance to strike. You would be closer to what I do if you studied the predatory techniques of lions on the African Plains. They wait for the safest method to attack their prey. So survival might be more the correct form. I'm sure that my knowledge of probability has a clear distinction for inclusion in the science end of this too. I use a baseline in order to see the interval created by the situational awareness caused during observation of data flow sets.

[Number Six]

Giz, I'm doing an experiment. I have a technique which I use for a plein method that lets me easily track wheel movements from sector to sector, basically analysing the behaviour of the random flow. Each outcome is allocated a code based on certain "mechanics" and the codes generate sequences of results in which exploitable series are very easy to identify. I can adapt the technique for any variety of bet. Yesterday I messed around with R and B and it seemed to work fairly well. What I want to do really is expand my ability to play the game by mastering a new type of simple situational bet. From the off, I'd rather not waste time practising e/cs only to realise that they're impossible to beat. What would you recommend I concentrate on: 1:1 payouts or 2:1 payouts?

[gizmotron]

What would you recommend I concentrate on: 1:1 payouts or 2:1 payouts?

I don't even bother looking at the ECs. I track nine dozens. Three are based on the wheel layout, six are based on the table layout. I also play the six double streets sometimes. You need a very low costing bet that treads water just to pass through the times when it is not showing an attack time. It's like the 21 players that wait until there is an advantage for them to increase their bets. It's a confirmed advantage in Black Jack.  Did you know that if you are pretty sure what dozen is acting like it won't hit, the other two dozens in the similar group become an EC that pay two to one? All you have to do is hunt for sleeping dozens and you have a higher paying EC in the other two.

Obviously it would pay you to track more than nine dozens. I think I will add three more and make it an even dozen based on four sets rather than three. I'll now break the wheel into three slices of a pie. All you do is commit your non table based groups to memory.

[Number Six]

Well, I appreciate the clarity, and I agree with most points you have outlined in the thread. And I also think that if people took the time to understand the random flow they would improve their game dramatically and open up the flood gates. This forum could be a great site for production if people were only willing to participate in serious thought and leave the x and y systems at the door. To each his own, though.

[gizmotron]

Well, I appreciate the clarity, and I agree with most points you have outlined in the thread. And I also think that if people took the time to understand the random flow they would improve their game dramatically and open up the flood gates. This forum could be a great site for production if people were only willing to participate in serious thought and leave the x and y systems at the door. To each his own, though.

Reading random flow will never be an x and y system. I can describe something that is like it though. It's like riding a mountain bike on a mountain trail that you have never ridden before.  You have a skill set on how to round banked turns. You know how tired you will get as you grind uphill for 4,000 vertical feet in altitude. You know how similarities in previous riding conditions apply to maintaining control in new conditions. It's the same with reading randomness. I'm suggesting that most people fall on their butts the first time they ride beyond their experience. I learned this about randomness over many years. I learned to stay on the bike, to stay on the peddles so to speak. I know almost everyone hates this but it was a head on collision with an elegant pattern that made me consider discovery. Nobody believes in them but me. Funny, I rode two in my lifetime. That's two perfect patterns in thirty years. Perhaps elegant patterns will drive all the devils away like gargoyles on building architectures. I hope so. I want all this to be hard. I only want people that earn it using it. It's purely a selfish attempt to protect something worth sharing with only a few people at first. It has the ability to change everything.

[gizmotron]

-