Four Spins to Win System - Played with Real Money at Go Casino - See Inside

[rjeaton1]

Ok, good to know.  I think with my first go I'll go with not continuing the progression.  An avg. of $100 per 200 spins of the wheel is just fine with me 

After I get the RX coding back I'm going to see how after a loss shooting to get back half of your losses works out.  I.E.  You lose the 1,1,2,4 progression (when betting on 17 numbers that is) and instead of continuing it at 8,16,32,64 you would go to 2,4,8,16.

I'm only waiting for the RX coding because after 2,200 spins of this system (half in real play, half in testing mode) testing another 1,000 spins not for real money just sounds like....too much, haha.

[celiza427]

After I get the RX coding back I'm going to see how after a loss shooting to get back half of your losses works out.  I.E.  You lose the 1,1,2,4 progression (when betting on 17 numbers that is) and instead of continuing it at 8,16,32,64 you would go to 2,4,8,16.

I'm only waiting for the RX coding because after 2,200 spins of this system (half in real play, half in testing mode) testing another 1,000 spins not for real money just sounds like....too much, haha.

Ha! Completely understandable.  Also, love the idea of getting at least half back - a little less risk there.  Betting 16 a # is rather steep (unless your BR is over $1000 like somebody's was  )  Can't wait for that RX program, will make the tracking even easier - thanks again, man!

[rjeaton1]

The first 1100 test spins I did, I just quit the progression and started over and still came out ahead +500 units, so if trying to get back half of your losses works out that would be a nice bonus.  If not, just quitting works too because you're right.  $100 for 200 spins on average isn't bad, haha.

[rjeaton1]

Ha! Completely understandable.  Also, love the idea of getting at least half back - a little less risk there.  Betting 16 a # is rather steep (unless your BR is over $1000 like somebody's was  )  Can't wait for that RX program, will make the tracking even easier - thanks again, man!

If you and I had the capability to bet at a casino that allowed bet amounts other than whole numbers we could reduce that 16 on a # problem by shooting to only get back a third of your losses.  I.E. - .70, 1.40, 2.80, 6.20 (added of course to what you would be betting had you just started the progression over)  That would be great!

[ckb18]

  thats right buddy!

[celiza427]

RJ, another question.  In the the videos I saw you putting RX into condensed mode...are you using RX to track this system, and if so, how?  Right now I'm using Rpro's Unique Number Tracker.

[rjeaton1]

RJ, another question.  In the the videos I saw you putting RX into condensed mode...are you using RX to track this system, and if so, how?  Right now I'm using Rpro's Unique Number Tracker.

Great question, you can watch a video I made for Simon here: nolinks://nolinks.megaupload.com/?d=J68JN0Z2

It's a rather small video, and you'll see how I use RXtreme for tracking in this system.

[dvdmaster]

hi Rjeation1,

I saw one of your video "6th times on Four spins to win" and at the end, you put over $30 on one number, is this normal? 
Also, isn't the progression is 1124 then start again??

DVdmaster

[cabbage]

@gabbage
I didn t read all ur post couse I got bored  lol

but if it says that I am jelous...this isn t true!
couse if someone have found a winning system and expose it ,like RJ did I will make money from it too!
so I don t care to be the inventor of it.....
I just care to meke money!!!!!!!

Sorry Viper you did seem pissed that all the attention or "limelight" was on RJ... so i know its not about the money for you,its just the attention seeking or "hero status" your after since you joined the site but nothing wrong with that, though,I think you should learn to except that there are other talanted system/method creators that will get thier 5 minutes.

Peace

[simon]

technical questions-- technical answers-- please no emotional outbursts with all caps and lots of exclamation points (not to censor anyone-- I guess if you must, you must)-- just wondering if these questions can be answered objectively-- or not-- which could help determine if this system has merit-- or not.  It may not be possible to answer these questions, I don't know, but I think the probabilities could be computed, but may not be necessary to actually calculate it out... just wondering....

ok we know that there is a high probability that cycles of 37/38 spins will produce more than 20 unique numbers (24 numbers), yes I have seen the mathematical tables in regards to this.  now though in this system we will be betting on a smaller percentage of these cycles of spins, because of the betting opportunity we are waiting for.  So I think it would be helpful to know, what percentage of all or typical 37 (or 38) spin cycles would we be betting, based on the betting opportunities/rules of the system?  Are we betting on half the cycles?  More than half?  A quarter of them?  Less?  The next question is, does this matter?  Does this present the same problem as waiting for black to hit ten times in a row before betting on red, only to find out that the total of all runs that will occur that are greater than 10 will equalize that bet?  (which is a mathematical certainty, I can assure you.)

I don't know though, if this system presents the same problem.  I think, if one could know what percent of the typical 37 spin cycle this system will beat (and it will beat a high percentage of these spin cycles), and we could know what percent of the spin cycles we would actually be betting on, somehow we can put the two together to come up with some kind of working prediction about the system.  I don't know, just throwing this out there, need someone smarter than me to offer some real, objective, technical, non-emotional, non-judgemental, non-philosophical, non-opinionated, specific answers or comments about this, would be nice.

So the main question is, can we really capture the high probability of a win in these cycles, or by limiting the cycles of spins we are betting, will our expected wins/losses somehow be equalized by the expected wins/losses in the cycles of spins we did not play?  And/but, can the progression help us secure these wins we "don't deserve" so to speak, by not playing the cycles of spins we skipped?

(alright I guess opinionated answers are ok)

[argie]

I tried to download the system to do my own tests, clicking in the link from RJ's post but i get the following message: "No download exists".

RJ, o somebody that download it while it worked, can you post it again please?

Thanks

[The Spiders Kiss]

I tried to download the system to do my own tests, clicking in the link from RJ's post but I get the following message: "No download exists".

RJ, o somebody that download it while it worked, can you post it again please?

Thanks

yep I tried too as well....no joy
TSK

[celiza427]

That's strange, but I would wait for RJ...don't want to step on his toes and post it if he meant to take it down - but I don't know why he would.

[argie]

...if he meant to take it down...

Well, i hope this is not the case, i've red the hole thread, it took me a while, i wanted to read it all before starting to test it just in case he might do any mod's... please RJ, if you read this post, it would be ok if you upload it again, despite if you took it down or not.

Thanks

[rjeaton1]

Hey guys, (yes I did in fact take the download down, as I didn't see this post generating much interest, test results or suggestions...other than arguing)  with the exception of a couple of people.  I'm really happy to hear you guys read this thread and want to download the system, that makes me really happy!

I have re-posted the download here: nolinks://vlsroulette.com/downloads/?sa=view;id=380

Enjoy guys, and I can't wait to hear what you're results are!

[rjeaton1]

-